Live data from Hacker News

Routed Gothic Font

webonastick.com

31–40 of 60 posts

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#31

For a newer font in this vein, I'd look at B612, a font designed in cooperation with Airbus specifically for visibility inside cockpits: https://github.com/polarsys/b612/blob/master/docs/B612-Leafl...

...and for an older font, look at Futura and its variants --- whose users in aerospace included Boeing and NASA.

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#34
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the risk of sounding "out of touch with reality" and "retro nostalgic", I strongly believe that a lot of clean, sterile work took place in the 1965-1985 era. From UNIX to SR-71, everything mankind did in the technical space was minimal, purposeful, clean, legible, durable, maintainable, modular and many other adjectives that would compound on the idea of creating a truly better product or service. Marketing took a…

Perhaps what has survived into the 21st century are simple designs and less so complex ones.

Survivorship bias at work.

Unix was a reaction against failed complex designs. So was the F-16, maybe a better example in military aviation because the SR-71 had such a unique purpose.

Popular and complex things from that era have been forgotten: PL/1, the VAX instruction set, overuse of manifold vacuum to power car accessories.

One can hope that simplicity comes in waves. Complexity is popular right now.

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#35

It's not ugly, it's beautiful.

At the risk of sounding "out of touch with reality" and "retro nostalgic", I strongly believe that a lot of clean, sterile work took place in the 1965-1985 era. From UNIX to SR-71, everything mankind did in the technical space was minimal, purposeful, clean, legible, durable, maintainable, modular and many other adjectives that would compound on the idea of creating a truly better product or service. Marketing took a…

> Now we have AI and Quantum and all these fucking buzzwords

“Quantum” is from the 1920s. It’s not really a buzzword but more an adjective describing our most accurate model of reality yet that physics can provide.

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the risk of sounding "out of touch with reality" and "retro nostalgic", I strongly believe that a lot of clean, sterile work took place in the 1965-1985 era. From UNIX to SR-71, everything mankind did in the technical space was minimal, purposeful, clean, legible, durable, maintainable, modular and many other adjectives that would compound on the idea of creating a truly better product or service. Marketing took a…

> Now we have AI and Quantum and all these fucking buzzwords “Quantum” is from the 1920s. It’s not really a buzzword but more an adjective describing our most accurate model of reality yet that physics can provide.

The way it is used in today's marketing related to Quantum Computing is pretty fricking crazy though - I recently stumbled upon a good example:

Microsoft Quantum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba88EwG5b0Q

If this isn't full of buzzwords, what is!

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#37
> "I created this font by purchasing a Leroy Lettering set, using Inkscape to trace the scanned letterforms of one of its templates, and some FontForge Python scripting."

How does this work from a copyright/legal perspective?

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#38
post #37

> "I created this font by purchasing a Leroy Lettering set, using Inkscape to trace the scanned letterforms of one of its templates, and some FontForge Python scripting." How does this work from a copyright/legal perspective?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_protecti...: "Typefaces cannot be protected by copyright in the United States". (Note that fonts--e.g. a .ttf or .otf file--can, though.)

Other jurisdictions do provide protection for the abstract shapes represented by typefaces.

Re: Routed Gothic Font

#40
post #34
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps what has survived into the 21st century are simple designs and less so complex ones.

Survivorship bias at work. Unix was a reaction against failed complex designs. So was the F-16, maybe a better example in military aviation because the SR-71 had such a unique purpose. Popular and complex things from that era have been forgotten: PL/1, the VAX instruction set, overuse of manifold vacuum to power car accessories. One can hope that simplicity comes in waves. Complexity is popular right now.

SR-71 was indeed extremely complex and expensive to operate. They got rid of it as soon as they could.

There are good free books available of the subject. Just looking at the amount of heat management and the required systems and heat exhchangers...

Post reply on HN