Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would love to see the reviewer report.
https://scholarlyoa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/reviewer-... I'm not sure whether that's the full report though.
Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
31–40 of 72 posts
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shame he did not pay. Wonder what the impact factor of the article would have been. (I would have cited it)
I strongly suspect that it would not have really been published.
http://www.ijact.org/index.php/ijact
Having the papers there makes it look more like a "real" journal, and potentially makes the author decide to submit more in the future. I would even assume a lot of the authors "publishing" in such journals are perfectly aware of their quality, and do this just to increase their "peer-reviewed publications" stats. It is very difficult to separate those from legitimate journals on a publication list.
For those not in academia: there are 100s of those journals. I get invitations to publish in such journals or conferences almost daily on my professional address. Some of them have the very same formatting as the ones in the article (same ugly fonts and colors).
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#33The story behind this is here: https://scholarlyoa.com/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-lace... “After receiving a spam email from the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology, Dr. Peter Vamplew of Federation University Australia’s School of Engineering and Information Technology sent the anti-spam article as a reply to the spam email without any other message, expecting that they might open it and read i…
There are so many stories like this. My favorite (although this one is very good) is that that a bunch of academics got together and pasted together some absolute nonsense (I assume this is from the era before SciGen) and submitted it to a conference. When it was accepted they revealed the hoax, and the conference admins claimed that it was because these academics were obviously very good, they figured the paper was…
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20181003015636/https://www.wsj.c...
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#34The story behind this is here: https://scholarlyoa.com/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-lace... “After receiving a spam email from the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology, Dr. Peter Vamplew of Federation University Australia’s School of Engineering and Information Technology sent the anti-spam article as a reply to the spam email without any other message, expecting that they might open it and read i…
There are so many stories like this. My favorite (although this one is very good) is that that a bunch of academics got together and pasted together some absolute nonsense (I assume this is from the era before SciGen) and submitted it to a conference. When it was accepted they revealed the hoax, and the conference admins claimed that it was because these academics were obviously very good, they figured the paper was…
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/new-sokal-...
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#35The story behind this is here: https://scholarlyoa.com/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-lace... “After receiving a spam email from the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology, Dr. Peter Vamplew of Federation University Australia’s School of Engineering and Information Technology sent the anti-spam article as a reply to the spam email without any other message, expecting that they might open it and read i…
There are so many stories like this. My favorite (although this one is very good) is that that a bunch of academics got together and pasted together some absolute nonsense (I assume this is from the era before SciGen) and submitted it to a conference. When it was accepted they revealed the hoax, and the conference admins claimed that it was because these academics were obviously very good, they figured the paper was…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
Others:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scholarly_publishing_s...
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#36The story behind this is here: https://scholarlyoa.com/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-lace... “After receiving a spam email from the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology, Dr. Peter Vamplew of Federation University Australia’s School of Engineering and Information Technology sent the anti-spam article as a reply to the spam email without any other message, expecting that they might open it and read i…
Intentional or not, it is an irony
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
While a good deal of our entertainment circa 1993 (Computer Science Honours, Sydney University) centered around exploiting this delightful fact (close second: unattended terminals), I had long since figured that forging emails off a open SMTP port wasn't really still A Thing.
Oh, it most definitely still is A Thing. There have been a few notable attempts to stop it happening, but none of them have really worked completely, and they only apply to some from-domains.
Try sending a mail from satya.nadella@microsoft.com to anyone you know.
Re: Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List (2005) [pdf]
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would point out that there is nothing in the SMTP standard stopping anyone from sending stuff from any email address.
While a good deal of our entertainment circa 1993 (Computer Science Honours, Sydney University) centered around exploiting this delightful fact (close second: unattended terminals), I had long since figured that forging emails off a open SMTP port wasn't really still A Thing.