31–40 of 209 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
exactly. IMO if you're generating code, it should happen at build/compile time not at checkin
What would the rationale be for that?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"CodeGuru’s machine learning models are trained on Amazon’s code bases comprising hundreds of thousands of internal projects, as well as over 10,000 open source projects in GitHub" - from the article.
Oh no, the code quality is going to be shit.
The code review feature seems too expensive to run on every PR automatically (to me): $0.75 per 100 lines of code. From their example pricing: "if you have a typical pull request with 500 lines of code, it would only cost $3.75 to run CodeGuru Reviewer on it." I wonder if it's actually good enough to justify that price.
That’s incredibly cheap, assuming it provides good suggestions. How much time does it take you to review 500 lines of code change, and what’s your time worth? If it takes 10 minutes and your time is worth about $20/hour or more, this service will part for itself immediately.
The code review feature seems too expensive to run on every PR automatically (to me): $0.75 per 100 lines of code. From their example pricing: "if you have a typical pull request with 500 lines of code, it would only cost $3.75 to run CodeGuru Reviewer on it." I wonder if it's actually good enough to justify that price.
That’s incredibly cheap, assuming it provides good suggestions. How much time does it take you to review 500 lines of code change, and what’s your time worth? If it takes 10 minutes and your time is worth about $20/hour or more, this service will part for itself immediately.
>It’s like having a distinguished engineer on call, 24x7
I don't believe that, regardless of how many times they sprinkle in the words "machine" and "learning".
Was there a list of supported languages somewhere? I couldn't find it.
But due my Visa situation here in the US (H1B), I'll be never able to monetize it as it's illegal to have a side income. But I think this is just the start and there is an huge opportunity for new startups and projects.
The code review feature seems too expensive to run on every PR automatically (to me): $0.75 per 100 lines of code. From their example pricing: "if you have a typical pull request with 500 lines of code, it would only cost $3.75 to run CodeGuru Reviewer on it." I wonder if it's actually good enough to justify that price.
Trying to compare it to another code analyzer... https://sonarcloud.io/about/pricing 100k lines for €10/mo.
The code review feature seems too expensive to run on every PR automatically (to me): $0.75 per 100 lines of code. From their example pricing: "if you have a typical pull request with 500 lines of code, it would only cost $3.75 to run CodeGuru Reviewer on it." I wonder if it's actually good enough to justify that price.
I found what it generates. https://github.com/pediredla/Algorithms/pull/3/files It looks like a linter, but maybe there is more.
I've never seen a linter tell me problems with code in this detail before: > You are using a `ConcurrentHashMap`, but your usage of `get()` and `put()` may not be thread-safe at lines: 110, 113, 135, and 137 . Two threads can perform this same check at the same time and one thread can overwrite the value written by the other thread.