Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

theinformation.com

31–40 of 96 posts

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#31

Puzzle me this - as an employee in the US, for a company paying well above market for your labor, with generous perks and the freedom to speak out against the employer (which is likely absent in China), the response of the Chinese workforce seems rather paradoxical - criticising an accommodating work environment, which, mind you, is only possible because of freedom of speech Or, the press is out to make a mountain of…

Who's to say those employee actions are not being scrutinized by others and reported back? As the US and China implement different tit for tat policies, relatives at home can be punished for the actions of relatives abroad.

I'm a Chinese national working in the US. I have never heard of this kind of punishment.

Can you provide any evidence?

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#32
post #18
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is no bias against China as a country, or Chinese people. At some point you also have to make it about the people, too, after all the Chinese Communist Party is comprised of Chinese people.

What percentage of Chinese citizens are actual party members? Honest question, I have no idea, but if I had to wager I would guess not a very large percentage.

From some estimate they have about 80 million members. Because becoming a party member is a prerequisite to any degree of success in China, both in business or government. Being a member one has to abide by very strict internal party rules (not the kind of code of conduct/ethics you are thinking). It is a completely top-down organization. You don't get to decide your party leader, sorry!

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#33
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This might suit both anti- and pro-PRC propagandists, but it's not reflective of reality on the ground. Chinese people have plenty of self-conception, independent thoughts, and the ability to distinguish between themselves and their government and objectively judge government actions. At least, no less so than people anywhere.

Anyone who's ever lived in china for several years will tell you chinese nationalism is extremely intense. Even in america, if you have a conversation with a chinese person about the PRC or even just economic conditions in china, that person will in any case, always defend the PRC under any condition, no matter what the PRC has done, even if they themselves are against the PRC and agree with what your saying.

Having dated several people from the mainland, this is not my experience. Which isn't to say we always agree on PRC politics, but the idea that they uncritically buy the Party line is simply wrong.

If mainland Chinese people are mindless drones incapable of independent thought, why does the PRC need to invest billions of dollars every year in monitoring and policing what people say and think?

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#34
post #23
post #7

Title should read: "Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils (Chinese) Facebook Employees" At any rate, I applaud Zuckerberg for actually having a spine when it comes to China, unlike Tim Cook.

Zuckerberg for actually having a spine when it comes to China, unlike Tim Cook What spine? Facebook is blocked in China. It costs him nothing to take this stance. If Tim Cook tried the same, China could seize the factories and Apple would have no product to sell. I'm sure in private Tim Cook would admit that Apple needs to diversify their manufacturing out of China as a hedge against the risk of a hostile government…

[deleted]

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Come on. That's patently not true. Seriously. I'm born Chinese and my family is Chinese. We were never "trained". I'm highly critical of the Chinese government (though I left fairly young) as are some members of my family. Some of them were born and raised there. Come on. Stop it with the stereotypes. People are complicated and have multitudes. "People are tauhgt to think of themselves as completely the same as their…

> (though I left fairly young) how is it reasonable to take your anecdote as a decent reference point for somebody who has grown up in china, speaking mandarin, and learning about the world through CCP-funded public schooling?

It's very reasonable to take that anecdote as a decent reference.

I grew up in China, speak Mandarin and mostly learned about the world through CCP schools.

Most of the kids and their family (and even teachers) are critical of CCP.

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#36
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who's to say those employee actions are not being scrutinized by others and reported back? As the US and China implement different tit for tat policies, relatives at home can be punished for the actions of relatives abroad.

I'm a Chinese national working in the US. I have never heard of this kind of punishment. Can you provide any evidence?

Try becoming an activist, or attend a pro-HK freedom rally in the US.

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Come on. That's patently not true. Seriously. I'm born Chinese and my family is Chinese. We were never "trained". I'm highly critical of the Chinese government (though I left fairly young) as are some members of my family. Some of them were born and raised there. Come on. Stop it with the stereotypes. People are complicated and have multitudes. "People are tauhgt to think of themselves as completely the same as their…

> (though I left fairly young) how is it reasonable to take your anecdote as a decent reference point for somebody who has grown up in china, speaking mandarin, and learning about the world through CCP-funded public schooling?

Is it any less reasonable than someone claiming the totality of Chinese culture consists of blind obedience to a political party? He's claiming this kind of indoctrination starts at a young age. If that's the case I would have seen some of that. Also, as I've stated, a good chunk of my family are born and raised in China and some still live there. They're not all of one opinion when it comes to the government. Is it reasonable to believe 1.3 billion people are as one dimensional and robotic as the GP makes it sound?

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#38
post #7

Title should read: "Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils (Chinese) Facebook Employees" At any rate, I applaud Zuckerberg for actually having a spine when it comes to China, unlike Tim Cook.

Title should read "Zuckerberg takes positive stance for headlines which costs his company nothing"

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#39
post #7

Title should read: "Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils (Chinese) Facebook Employees" At any rate, I applaud Zuckerberg for actually having a spine when it comes to China, unlike Tim Cook.

Have you heard the news that Mark has learnt Chinese very hard, and even placed Xi's book at his office desk trying to please the visited Chinese officials? He didn't have any spine, and what he's doing right now just because he failed so have to change the strategy.

Re: Zuckerberg’s Anti-China Rhetoric Roils Facebook's Chinese Employees

#40
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a Chinese national working in the US. I have never heard of this kind of punishment. Can you provide any evidence?

Try becoming an activist, or attend a pro-HK freedom rally in the US.

The post I replied to was specifically referring on the "employee actions". My argument was it's not reasonable to simply discard these employee's claim by somehow suggesting they are only acting because of the pressure from CCP.

But the point you made is correct, activist's family could be punishment.

edit: punishment -> punished

Post reply on HN