It's incredible that pronouns can bring down an entire community. Pick you battles please, we're losing good things because of this silly conflict.
Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
31–40 of 444 posts
Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#32Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still quite difficult for normies to get to the 15 reputation threshold on SO in order to begin using the site effectively. There are problems here that run a lot deeper than political correctness, though I don't want to minimize how cancerous that has been.
"normies"?
Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#34While, in the beginning, a very active user, I've long now given up on that network. I can't remember when was the last time I asked a question without being forced to defend it for a period of at least a few hours, why it shouldn't be closed as a duplicate, offtopic or ... It used to be an excellent network, but nowadays it's just script-kiddies-playing-admins/editors playground. It is no longer a productive technic…
Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#35I don’t understand why gender/pronouns is even being discussed. Someone’s personal feelings don’t really have any place in a question/answers site. It’s fine to respect a persons feelings and such when talking to a person but when answering a question or asking the question. The gender/pronoun is irrelevant.
Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#36Honest Question: Why continue to support stack exchange through this? They have shown themselves to be disingenuous at best. They are now profiting off free labor. They started it because ExpertsExchange was hiding answers. They rode the high horse to hypocrisy. Why continue helping people like that succeed? Why not just start a new one? Leave en masse to a new playground. Speak with your answers. Show the powers tha…
what do you mean by support? I google and sometimes use their content and that's it. There are other sources.
Continue to give them time and help them create the product they are going to sell to someone else and keep all the money for themselves.
And also support by voicing concerns. Showing them what their user base wants when they clearly don't care what their user base wants, only what they want in their wallet.
Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#37Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
"normies"?
I think wyclif means casual users, who want to participate in SE community by answering questions.
Re: Dear Stack Exchange, Inc.
#39Shouldn’t the CTO fire the person who was directly responsible for firing Monica? Why isn’t that part of it?