Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
31–40 of 130 posts
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#32Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#33If this turns out to be true, I wonder if this is something CRISPR could fix...
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#34So now we're including "survival of the unfittest" as part of evolutionary theory? Sorry, this makes zero sense. If humans really did evolve, then we hit the lottery - several times.
This is the second time I see skepticism about evolution is brought up on HN comments. Science literacy of the community definitely went down.
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#35What a way to start an article in a website with "science" in its name.
Atheroma is an accumulation of white blood cells. White. Blood. Cells. Not fat.
"Meat bad, saturated fat bad, eat your necessarily fortified grains and heart-healthy industrially extracted seed oils."
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#36Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#37On the other hand, cats -- for example -- are highly prone to kidney failure in a way that humans are not.
Domestic cats are at risk, but that is more a result of domestication and improper feeding (carbohydrate) than evolution or genetics. Unless I am missing something, of course! Care to elaborate?
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#38So now we're including "survival of the unfittest" as part of evolutionary theory? Sorry, this makes zero sense. If humans really did evolve, then we hit the lottery - several times.
When the options are “malaria with high probability from birth onwards” or “heart attack after multiple decades with high probability if nothing else kills you first”, this is fitness.
Besides which, if humans didn’t evolve, you need to explain why the creator didn’t use a better mechanism to prevent us from getting malaria. For example: not creating malaria when they created us.
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Malaria is a fascinating one, with the prevalence of sickle cell anemia and G6PD blood deficiency in some populations with high exposure. Both of those cause health issues but they both confer some level of resistance to malaria.
Isn’t the recessive gene for cystic fibrosis also linked to malaria resistance? Edit: apparently it might be linked to a resistance to cholera.
Re: Evolutionary gene loss may explain why only humans are prone to heart attack
#40> Atherosclerosis -- the clogging of arteries with fatty deposits What a way to start an article in a website with "science" in its name. Atheroma is an accumulation of white blood cells. White. Blood. Cells. Not fat. "Meat bad, saturated fat bad, eat your necessarily fortified grains and heart-healthy industrially extracted seed oils."
-sclerosis is a hardening. E.g arthrosclerosis for a hardening of joints.