Anyone use this? Pros/cons vs Textmate/vim/emacs?
Kod.app is open source
31–40 of 66 posts
Re: Kod.app is open source
#32Anyone use this? Pros/cons vs Textmate/vim/emacs?
Pro: Its a new editor and shows a lot of promise.
Con: Its a new editor and needs a lot of work.
Re: Kod.app is open source
#33If TextMate 2.0 is not released soon (or doesn't meet expectations), MacroMates is in trouble.
I really wish people would stop complaining about TextMate 2.0, just because it's been talked about doesn't mean the current version stopped working or lost features. I'm a daily TextMate user for nearly 6 years and it has never once not met my expectations. It's first app I install on a new machine/install. Kod is a great start so far, but still has a ways to catch up. I wish the developer the best and that it works…
I totally agree with this. TextMate is the best editor I've ever used, I don't really need a 2.0. That being said, I'm interesting in seeing what exactly will be fixed/new in 2.0, but I'm doing just fine without it and so are many others.
Re: Kod.app is open source
#34Re: Kod.app is open source
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not by you.
So I am pretty sure you have your successful open source story to share. Where you saved the queen, anything green, the oxygen, as we know it - and made millions along the way - while slaying bad guys around. PS. It is easy to spot a clown.
Not quite sure I follow.
Re: Kod.app is open source
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really wish people would stop complaining about TextMate 2.0, just because it's been talked about doesn't mean the current version stopped working or lost features. I'm a daily TextMate user for nearly 6 years and it has never once not met my expectations. It's first app I install on a new machine/install. Kod is a great start so far, but still has a ways to catch up. I wish the developer the best and that it works…
Granted it's a one of the most used software on my laptop, it's definitely not at the "never once not met my expectations" level. I don't think I have super high expectations either... I want soft-wrap to happen properly. I could go on with list of needs but it's pointless. I've given up hope that there will be ever an update and learnt to live with v1.x. However, that's just settling. As soon as I find something bet…
Unfortunately, MacRabbit won't be updating Espresso until the first half of 2011 (probably 4-5 months).
See: http://twitter.com/#!/espressoapp/status/18041354806370304
Re: Kod.app is open source
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not by you.
So I am pretty sure you have your successful open source story to share. Where you saved the queen, anything green, the oxygen, as we know it - and made millions along the way - while slaying bad guys around. PS. It is easy to spot a clown.
You need a story which has millions of dollars, women and open source? - Android.
Re: Kod.app is open source
#38Re: Kod.app is open source
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
The intent seems clear to me; "You can't build + sell the app on its own. But, if you want to use a part of the code in your own app, go for it."
Build and use is enough for most people. But of course things would be very ambiguous in terms of how much means "meaningful modification".
Right. What if I make a bunch of publicly released changes* that are then pulled back into the Kod codebase?
* Changes that fulfill this "meaningful modification" provision.
Re: Kod.app is open source
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Build and use is enough for most people. But of course things would be very ambiguous in terms of how much means "meaningful modification".
Right. What if I make a bunch of publicly released changes* that are then pulled back into the Kod codebase? * Changes that fulfill this "meaningful modification" provision.
My thought[1] is that your changes are your own, do as you please with them. Thats how I would treat it if I intended to do anything with Kod's source code, at least.
1. Please note: I'm very far from being anything that resembles a lawyer.