Why bother with the code? The value is with the existing links database, and since it belongs to the users, Yahoo shouldn't have the right to sell or distribute it freely. Since users can already import/export their bookmarks, the only support Yahoo needs to provide is keeping the import API open for a little longer after the site is shut down. Of course this assumes that users would want to migrate their data to a r…
Unless I am mistaken here (as far as copyright goes, if that's what you're talking about) the only data Delicious' users can claim any right to is the short descriptions they are able to add to each bookmark. The mere fact that they liked that page is data that can be freely distributed.
Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
31–40 of 92 posts
Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#32Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course this assumes that users would want to migrate their data to a replacement service. Or, for that matter, that users would share their tags with researchers who build on social tagging data: http://groups.google.com/group/get-theinfo/browse_thread/thr... Here is a (scraped?) delicious data set, for those who are interested: http://arvindn.livejournal.com/116137.html
Why would one want 10-days of bookmarks from 1.5 years ago?
Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#34We are also compiling stories about present use cases of Delicious. If you are a user, post them here and I'll update the question.
I never really cared about the social features. For me Delicious (and now Pinboard) is like a personal knowledge base, supporting my unreliable memory. For example when I want to check my favourite Vim plugins I search for tags vim+plugins+favs. I have more than 2k entries there collected over the course of the last five years. I only bookmark sites that are for some reason important to me, and have some lasting valu…
Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was actually thinking the same thing. Pity I don't have enough time. Though if someone makes a project I'd have to look into helping a little.
A possibility would be to build this on top of Noserub: http://noserub.com/
Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unless I am mistaken here (as far as copyright goes, if that's what you're talking about) the only data Delicious' users can claim any right to is the short descriptions they are able to add to each bookmark. The mere fact that they liked that page is data that can be freely distributed.
Nah, the tags themselves is what he was getting at. Not saying I agree or disagree with him, but that's the value.
Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#37I want Open Source Federated Delicious. Anyone wanna help make it?
Re: Hey Yahoo, Can you please open source Delicious?
#38We are also compiling stories about present use cases of Delicious. If you are a user, post them here and I'll update the question.
Delicious was one of the best resources for finding articles on niche interests, for surfacing articles that were especially good, and for finding others interested in the same topics as you. As for two specific examples: Learning Ruby on Rails has been a long, slow, struggle for me. A number of reasons for that, but one of the main ones being that I don't have many other programmers in my area that I can talk about…
I wonder if this could be implemented as an API of websites? (Or perhaps on behalf of websites?) Instead of one single site, you'd have a p2p network of sites using protocols similar to those used for digital cash schemes. Think: a distributed open marketplace of middlemen. A sort of Diaspora middle tier.