Live data from Hacker News

Is The NFL Keeping Cable/Satellite Companies In The TV Business?

macdougherty.com

31–32 of 32 posts

Re: Is The NFL Keeping Cable/Satellite Companies In The TV Business?

#31
post #13

I don't know why everybody is so keen to encourage others to give up cable TV. Sure, I don't have cable TV, and I get most of my video-watching via the internet. Where do I get my internet access from? Why, Comcast, the only provider of high-speed internet in my area. If everybody starts getting all their TV through the internet, what will Comcast do? They'll start charging everybody a lot more for internet access in…

What you're describing sounds suspiciously like an abuse by Comcast of their monopoly, to the consumers' detriment.

Ha - I think that's already happening...

Re: Is The NFL Keeping Cable/Satellite Companies In The TV Business?

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But what about blackouts? When the team stadium sales are below x% they aren't allowed to broadcast the game at all, in order to theoretically drive more ticket sales.

True, but blackouts are relatively rare in the NFL, unless its 2009 and you're the Raiders. In fact, the Chargers were about 1,000 tickets away from a blackout earlier this year, and posted this on their Twitter account, and quickly sold enough tickets.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2010-09-06-nfl-t...

"Last year's blackouts were confined to five teams, all of which had losing records: the Jacksonville Jaguars (seven blackouts, seven wins); Detroit Lions (four blackouts, two wins); Kansas City Chiefs (one blackout, four wins); Oakland Raiders (seven blackouts, five wins); and St. Louis Rams (three blackouts, one win)."

Post reply on HN