Live data from Hacker News

Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

talkshow.team

31–40 of 67 posts

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#31

I like the idea, but it's targeted for extroverted people, probably more for marketers and bizz in general, rather than programmers. Introverts like me, will always prefer text conversation over recording myself. Also text is searchable where video is not.

> Also text is searchable where video is not.

Transcripts could help there.

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#32

Hi everyone. Founder here. I'm flattered that this popped up on HN. I'm a long-time lurker and browse multiple times a day but seldom post. For some context, you guys are looking at an MVP. It took me a month to build this. The marketing site was done in 2 hours (today, fuelled by coffee). I'm bootstrapping after leaving my corporate job last year. Not trying to make excuses, but I think a lot of questions can simply…

> I'm flattered that this popped up on HN.

Erm. Who is "middle1" then and why did they post this as "Show HN"?

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#33
post #21

It's an interesting idea, but I have a tough time with the premise that people will choose to record a video of themselves for everyday asynchronous communication rather than type a message. There are situations were video or audio deliver more value than text, but what are those situations and are they enough to become a team's main mode of communication? I'm skeptical.

This was my initial reaction - it feels a little bit like the option to send short voice messages via iMessage on iPhone, rather than typing. I've never used that feature because it doesn't seem to offer the same convenience factors that text messages offer - especially the ability to compose and consume them in any environment, irrespective of noise (or quiet), companions, and location. Kind of one step forwards, two steps back.

None of this is insurmountable, but I wonder if it will cause inertia in experimentation and uptake?

Good luck, either way - love the initiative the founder has shown. :)

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#34
post #21

It's an interesting idea, but I have a tough time with the premise that people will choose to record a video of themselves for everyday asynchronous communication rather than type a message. There are situations were video or audio deliver more value than text, but what are those situations and are they enough to become a team's main mode of communication? I'm skeptical.

Not enough to be the _main_ mode of communication, but definitely an important part of my team’s remote communications. I run www.gradientmetrics.com, and we’re a (very small) distributed team. We often do screencasts with voiceovers to show how we’re thinking of implementing something, what we think the outline of the deliverable should be, etc., etc. This can be _a lot_ easier to do with a video screencast than it is to type out. We typically do this either with a QuickTime screencast or with the person recording a solo Zoom conference with screen share, and uploading to Vimeo. If there was something that cut that workflow down and had some other features, we’d consider it.

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#35

I like the idea, but it's targeted for extroverted people, probably more for marketers and bizz in general, rather than programmers. Introverts like me, will always prefer text conversation over recording myself. Also text is searchable where video is not.

> Also text is searchable where video is not. Transcripts could help there.

With next-gen speech-to-text (voicea), it is modestly possible. Am sure that could get better by time!

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#36
post #21

It's an interesting idea, but I have a tough time with the premise that people will choose to record a video of themselves for everyday asynchronous communication rather than type a message. There are situations were video or audio deliver more value than text, but what are those situations and are they enough to become a team's main mode of communication? I'm skeptical.

Agreed about "main mode of communication", but training and onboarding come to mind as strong use cases. (shrug)

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#37
post #5
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So do Slack threads with videos in them. Or a #standup channel where people send in videos, that's what we do.

What do you use to record videos?

Agree with this sentiment - the workflows available in slack for doing this would be clunky. I have a phone but I would rather use a laptop camera for some discussions - e.g.: doing demos.

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#38

Hi everyone. Founder here. I'm flattered that this popped up on HN. I'm a long-time lurker and browse multiple times a day but seldom post. For some context, you guys are looking at an MVP. It took me a month to build this. The marketing site was done in 2 hours (today, fuelled by coffee). I'm bootstrapping after leaving my corporate job last year. Not trying to make excuses, but I think a lot of questions can simply…

> I'm flattered that this popped up on HN. Erm. Who is "middle1" then and why did they post this as "Show HN"?

I’m gonna invoke Hanlon’s Razor[1] here and assume middle1 is a random HN user that didn’t realize you only use “Show HN” when it’s your own project.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#39

I like the idea, but it's targeted for extroverted people, probably more for marketers and bizz in general, rather than programmers. Introverts like me, will always prefer text conversation over recording myself. Also text is searchable where video is not.

Text is also universally accessible, including for people with disabilities (e.g. deaf, blind, and for the recording side, people with speech impediments).

Re: Talkshow – Team videos in non-real-time

#40
post #21

It's an interesting idea, but I have a tough time with the premise that people will choose to record a video of themselves for everyday asynchronous communication rather than type a message. There are situations were video or audio deliver more value than text, but what are those situations and are they enough to become a team's main mode of communication? I'm skeptical.

Like you I would never think of using this but then I asked my kids and they looked at me quite as a benevolent advanced alien race might look down upon us: there there old man, no wonder your world is so tedious...no one writes their ideas down anymore...video, poor soul, is the only way we do things now.

I suppose I did something long ago when my parents told me to write home and I said they could use my PC and modem and use compuserve.

Sigh.

Post reply on HN