31–33 of 33 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What's causing the rise of these curated lists? People with good intentions that want a repo with a high star count. Getting over 500 stars on these readme-only/awesome/"curated" list is very easy. The problem is that curating these lists isn't easy work - people will throw 50+ PRs at you adding their random project. Most maintainers blindly accept them and then the list becomes useless. Sindre (original awesome li…
I do it only for stars... really man? Creating and maintaining such a list is not a simple thing. It's not awesome or other shit in the name. This is a collection of my short notes, one-liners, useful links, tools and more. I added it to gh, to share with others and get other interesting things. Not for stars! The amount of them is obviously nice but not crucial.
Great societies enable education frameworks that allow for total n00bs to be hit with an ocean of knowledge and walk out smarter, i really appreciate the people in this day and age taking their precious time out to consolidate lists like these. Thank you!