Live data from Hacker News

MyBrandNewLogo – A 3-step Logo Generator

mybrandnewlogo.com

31–40 of 113 posts

Re: MyBrandNewLogo – A 3-step Logo Generator

#31
post #12

I don't really see any difference between this and the others such as Logojoy. What I don't like about these services is that some tout AI generated logos etc etc when really they just take some input and generate the same logos over and over. There is no real AI going on.

Yeah, this is more like a random logo generator than something that's ML powered. I guess it could be using PCA or something on the backend to filter out "bad" logo designs.

I'd like to see more variations with the shapes. You see stars repeated a million times, it would be nice if the stars were actually different in size, shape and design.

Re: MyBrandNewLogo – A 3-step Logo Generator

#32

I used 99designs a few years back to get my company's logo. It was cheap, fast and good. You get to choose from several designs submitted by real designers and work with them to fine tune it. I am still very happy with the results. This service has pretty generic results, IMO.

99designs = 50% clip art + 50% blatant rips of existing logos + the StackOverflow logo.

That is, be sure to check you didn't end up with a stolen logo.

Re: MyBrandNewLogo – A 3-step Logo Generator

#34

I used 99designs a few years back to get my company's logo. It was cheap, fast and good. You get to choose from several designs submitted by real designers and work with them to fine tune it. I am still very happy with the results. This service has pretty generic results, IMO.

99designs = 50% clip art + 50% blatant rips of existing logos + the StackOverflow logo. That is, be sure to check you didn't end up with a stolen logo.

Should be like 99percentchanceofbeingstolen as those sites basically encourage logo theft. There's no other way to make money at those rates.

Re: MyBrandNewLogo – A 3-step Logo Generator

#36
post #18
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pedantically, AI really encompasses and represents a broad range of ML approaches, many of which are fundamentally just algorithmic. If there's a rubric for producing these and its intended to simulate the approach a human might take, one could argue it's artificial intelligence.

More pedantically, there’s no intelligence in ML; AI doesn’t exist (yet).

This devolves really quickly into debates on semantics. Which is not a bad thing, but it means it's important to be clear on definitions.

I've heard Artificial Intelligence snarkily defined as "whatever computers can't do" - once a human understands the problem well enough to make a computer solve it, solving the problem is no longer "AI".

What this says about human intelligence, if-and-when a computer can perform the full set of tasks a human can perform, is left as an exercise to the reader.

In any case, right now, a computer can provide answers to certain problems much more quickly and accurately than a human, and can provide more optimal answers. Whether a particular computer does this via hand-tuned heuristics, brute force applied to simple algorithms, or statistics over massive data sets, or some magic "AI" voodoo, it does it.

Re: MyBrandNewLogo – A 3-step Logo Generator

#38
The most amusing thing about this website is that they obviously had an actual designer do some work on it at some point, yet it implies that designers can be easily automated out of the process.

All of the "logos" this thing generates are completely thoughtless: it simply searches the Noun project based on your inputs for a vector image, then sets it next to a random typeface. Anyone with a modicum of design experience can tell you that these "logos" that it generates are a complete joke. If you're honestly considering using one of these yourself, just head to the noun project and search for an icon to plop down next to your favorite typeface—you'll probably come up with a better result.

Post reply on HN