Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no idea why you're getting downvoted. If a company decides not to produce wireless routers (which were class leading) or monitors etc anymore, all because they're non "core" to a computer/mobile hardware company then I don't see how building automotive AI is core to a computer/mobile hardware computer company that has zero core competency in either car manufacturing or AI.
> I don't see how building automotive AI is core to a computer/mobile hardware computer I don't see why Apple needs to stay within the bounds what what you think their "core" products are.
Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
31–40 of 391 posts
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well thats my point - it seems that they can't chew gum and walk at the same time. If they could, we'd have Macs that are updated to the latest gen hardware in a reasonable amount of time, and issues like the faulty keyboard would have been fixed by now after 3 years.
What makes you believe the autonomous car project comes at the expense of Mac improvements, rather than being unrelated?
Yes you don't want to be a total one trick pony, but if you do everything, you do nothing well.
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume he's talking about the car project. It seems like they now have fewer than 1000 engineers on that project, so I can't imagine what they're doing with that few engineers. That would be pretty small scope in the auto sector. There's one large automaker I consult for and they've got more people than that just working on software they use internally. So, in scale, it might seem like a vanity project, but Apple o…
> It seems like they now have fewer than 1000 engineers on that project I believe Apple has significantly more employees disclosed on this project than that. This is clearly not a "vanity project".
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#34When you can't make a laptop with reliable screens or keyboards, or an iMac lineup that has CPU's 2 generations behind.. Maybe it's time to shut down the stupid vanity projects and focus on your core business instead?
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#35When you can't make a laptop with reliable screens or keyboards, or an iMac lineup that has CPU's 2 generations behind.. Maybe it's time to shut down the stupid vanity projects and focus on your core business instead?
Regarding CPUs, I'm personally much more interested in being able to run macOS on my computer, iOS on my phone, and tvOS on my TV and have them all work together in ways that make me happy. If Apple could add a car to that, I'd be thrilled. I'm always willing to try other options, but I've just never found a setup that worked quite as well for me.
For example, I have a computer I built from parts from NewEgg and Nvidia about a year ago. It has a Threadripper 1950X processor, 128GB of RAM, and an Nvidia Titan V card in it. I used it for about a week and then went back to my MacBook Pro. The custom-built computer is gathering dust in the corner of my office. My point is that different things are important to different people.
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#36When you can't make a laptop with reliable screens or keyboards, or an iMac lineup that has CPU's 2 generations behind.. Maybe it's time to shut down the stupid vanity projects and focus on your core business instead?
I have no idea why you're getting downvoted. If a company decides not to produce wireless routers (which were class leading) or monitors etc anymore, all because they're non "core" to a computer/mobile hardware company then I don't see how building automotive AI is core to a computer/mobile hardware computer company that has zero core competency in either car manufacturing or AI.
Automotive AI meanwhile is a future and they have to think about future with all the money they have now.
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple makes the products Apple wants to make; that those product choices might not align with everyone's preferences (I'm pretty happy with my 2018 MBP, for instance) doesn't mean the company can't walk and chew gum at the same time. Particularly when they make $200 billion per year in revenue.
Well thats my point - it seems that they can't chew gum and walk at the same time. If they could, we'd have Macs that are updated to the latest gen hardware in a reasonable amount of time, and issues like the faulty keyboard would have been fixed by now after 3 years.
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#38Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
It reminds me of the Apple of the early 1990s. So many stupid vanity projects, some of which were actually pretty cool: Newton, Dylan, Copland, Taligent, OpenDoc, etc. And yet they couldn't succeed at their bread and butter of selling computers. There's no Steve Jobs to bring them back from the brink this time.
What precipice does Apple need to be walked back from? Certainly not the current one, where they rake in an amount of money roughly equal to the GDP of Luxembourg in a single quarter.
Apple started its slide the first time around 1989 - that was when Mac models started proliferating, when System 6 came out, and when its first sales decline happened. Jobs didn't return until 1998. That's almost a decade in between.
It's similar for other dominant companies - the writing was on the wall for IBM when Compaq & Dell started selling PC clones in 1983/1984, but they didn't need a turnaround until 1993. Sun Microsystems hit its zenith at the top of the dot-com boom in 2000, but its stock price didn't start sliding until 2007 and it wasn't purchased until 2010.
Re: Apple Lays Off 200 Employees from Autonomous Car Unit
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't see how building automotive AI is core to a computer/mobile hardware computer I don't see why Apple needs to stay within the bounds what what you think their "core" products are.
They don't, but as a public company they do have obligations to their shareholders which at least suggest they shouldn't be neglecting their core business.