Google is well aware and proud of that fact. They cut their bandwidth in half by not validating. I was playing with jQuery in the dev console in Chrome yesterday on the Google homepage and realized that I was writing valid jQuery, but that $("body") simply didn't exist.
They cut their bandwidth in half by not validating. Care to elaborate on this bullshit about cutting bandwidth in half? I just want to remind you that quoting attributes and leaving out some tags is perfectly valid in HTML5 and HTML4.01. Even in strict. Converting their markup to the valid one would not be difficult, and they could even save some bandwidth. For example: drop those stupid attributes for body tag. drop…
Markup validation of http://www.google.com
31–34 of 34 posts
Re: Markup validation of http://www.google.com
#32I would have expected better from google.
You're unintentionally hilarious. You know nothing about Google's technological challenges nor the decisions behind the various circumstances where they chose to ignore the standard. I guarantee you that there are thousands of people working at Google who are: 1. Smarter than you 2. Know more about web standards than you Seriously, get the hell out of here.
Re: Markup validation of http://www.google.com
#33I would have expected better from google.
Re: Markup validation of http://www.google.com
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're unintentionally hilarious. You know nothing about Google's technological challenges nor the decisions behind the various circumstances where they chose to ignore the standard. I guarantee you that there are thousands of people working at Google who are: 1. Smarter than you 2. Know more about web standards than you Seriously, get the hell out of here.
Please do not attack other users personally like this.