Live data from Hacker News

Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

namepros.com

31–40 of 435 posts

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#32
Be interesting to know how much $$$ passed hands on that deal - - - I don't think duck.com is similar enough to duckduckgo for a trademark dispute to rule in favor of duckduckgo, plus no smaller fish would go up against Google's legal ability . . . . now if they could just bag the URL for duckdynasty . . .

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#33
post #8

Interestingly transferred, not bought. Does Google buying DDG at this point make sense? Given their stance on privacy, it would allow Google control of the narrative..

In Europe, Google's search business' market share is above the threshold at which a concentration would automatically require antitrust approval - which it has, of course, no chance of obtaining.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#34
post #8

Interestingly transferred, not bought. Does Google buying DDG at this point make sense? Given their stance on privacy, it would allow Google control of the narrative..

duckduckgo would be worthless as a Google company.

The only reason I use it is because it isn't a Google company... well and the !bangs are good too.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#35
post #9

DDG is great - have been using it for months and I really enjoy the results. Google searches seem to be more of an echo chamber whereas DDG results seem to be more representative across a broad spectrum of sites.

To be honest I've never noticed the filter bubble everybody is talking about with Google. They can infer a lot from context, like city or previous searches, however that's primarily helping users, because coming up with precise search queries is not something that normal people can do and even power users like us fail at it.

I have been using DuckDuckGo because I'm making health related queries and I'm pretty scared of companies profiling me based on that.

But the experience with DDG has been worse, although it is definitely improving. And it's bearable, plus protecting my privacy is worth it.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#36

Though this is a good move, DuckDuckGo should really try and work toward taking ownership of http://ddg.com . With the 'D' and 'G' key separated by just one key in between on a standard QWERTY keyboard, this should really make it exponentially easier to get to DuckDuckGo's homepage.

I rarely type in duckduckgo.com. I just enter the search keyword into the URL bar and it takes me to DDG.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#37
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=duck&ia=web works fine for me ;)

You had to already know about it though. That is a foul. Or, more accurately, a water-foul.

It's the second result on Google, too: https://www.google.com/search?q=duck

Using an incognito window

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#40
post #9

DDG is great - have been using it for months and I really enjoy the results. Google searches seem to be more of an echo chamber whereas DDG results seem to be more representative across a broad spectrum of sites.

To be honest I've never noticed the filter bubble everybody is talking about with Google. They can infer a lot from context, like city or previous searches, however that's primarily helping users, because coming up with precise search queries is not something that normal people can do and even power users like us fail at it. I have been using DuckDuckGo because I'm making health related queries and I'm pretty scared…

> To be honest I've never noticed the filter bubble everybody is talking about with Google.

Filter bubbles are personalized, so YMMV.

Post reply on HN