Author failed to do any research, instead of going for the typical "FB is doing something secretive and cryptic" angle. Related links that explain this: https://www.facebook.com/business/news/facebook-attribution-... https://marketingland.com/facebook-attribution-now-available... https://old.reddit.com/r/adops/comments/9pycuk/facebook_atti... This hn thread is a perfect example of a news bubble. Googling "fbclid" ret…
This article was posted days before any of the links you've given. According to the metadata for the site, it was originally published on 2018-10-14 and last updated 2018-10-16. Facebook's own article about the feature came out 5 days after this article was published. So, at the time, Facebook _was_ being secretive about it. Aside from that one line, the entire article reads more like "this is new, I wonder what it d…
Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
31–40 of 91 posts
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
And another reason for me to avoid FB links. I'm sure blockers will begin stripping that out. FB just doesn't understand the optics they create.
They do, and we do. But the mass sheep audience does not. All they know is: "Does the link work?" and "Can I share it?" That's all.
I suppose there is someone even thinking that Portal will be good for their home.
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#33I wonder why would fb move away from the well-established utm [1] link parameters to this? From the article, I can't see any functional difference. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTM_parameters
First time I read about UTM. It looks like those parameters are used to track ad campaigns. They provide metrics over which campaign works best. The "fbclid" parameters on the other hand seems intended to track individual clicks. That is, Facebook wants to keep tracking individuals when they follow links to off-site pages.
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#34I can see urls eventually being thousands of characters long with referral links daisy chained.
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do, and we do. But the mass sheep audience does not. All they know is: "Does the link work?" and "Can I share it?" That's all.
True enough, even though there is nothing but negative sentiment these days toward the Facebook brand. I suppose there is someone even thinking that Portal will be good for their home.
I think it’s a great product and can’t wait to have mine at home.
All the fuss about tracking is non-sense. Ads are a great way to monetize products that you want to make available to a large audience. And obviously as a user you want meaningful ads and not just a bunch of garbage. To do that tracking is necessary...seems like a straightforward value exchange!
I also want to note that I buy stuff frequently from ads...some of my most loved items found me through ads! It’s frankly a great way to discover great stuff.
Do I sometimes see ads that are not relevant? Sure, just as I see post from friends/family that are not relevant...I just scroll by, easy as that!
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#36This is actually fantastic news for advertisers that have their own data warehouses and need to create a better 1-to-1 click tracking to internal user data. This allows much better attribution and testing of incrementality so businesses can tell where their value is truly coming from. I’m pretty excited to see this roll out more broadly.
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#37This is actually fantastic news for advertisers that have their own data warehouses and need to create a better 1-to-1 click tracking to internal user data. This allows much better attribution and testing of incrementality so businesses can tell where their value is truly coming from. I’m pretty excited to see this roll out more broadly.
Sarcastic?
If this wasn't Facebook this wouldn't be news, gclid has been around for years.
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#38I can see urls eventually being thousands of characters long with referral links daisy chained.
If I remember there is a 1024 character limit.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15090220/maximum-length-...
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
True enough, even though there is nothing but negative sentiment these days toward the Facebook brand. I suppose there is someone even thinking that Portal will be good for their home.
I actually ordered a Portal device for each of my family households (parents, grand parents, siblings and in-laws) for Christmas. I think it’s a great product and can’t wait to have mine at home. All the fuss about tracking is non-sense. Ads are a great way to monetize products that you want to make available to a large audience. And obviously as a user you want meaningful ads and not just a bunch of garbage. To do t…
Re: Facebook adding “fbclid” parameter to outbound links
#40So if you are part of the group who sees this as a good thing, I'm genuinely interested to understand why you see this as a good thing and whether you view the mass surveillance of the general public by advertising companies as bad?