Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
31–40 of 46 posts
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#32Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
Kindle - $15
Paperback (new) - $10
Paperback (used) - $6
Paperback (library) - Free
The Kindle version is a significant premium and I don't think there is a matching convenience factor. It's unfortunate that is the case because I'm sure it'd be a lot more eco-friendly and efficient to distribute ebooks.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#33Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
I think it's the price for eBooks. A good example is Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: Kindle - $15 Paperback (new) - $10 Paperback (used) - $6 Paperback (library) - Free The Kindle version is a significant premium and I don't think there is a matching convenience factor. It's unfortunate that is the case because I'm sure it'd be a lot more eco-friendly and efficient to distribute ebooks.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#34Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
For technical books where I’m using four fingers of my left hand to bookmark four different pages to flip back and forth to? Hate e-readers. They are simply far slower than paper at random access.
For anything where I’d like to appreciate the artistry of the book or its contents? Hate e-readers.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#35Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
I think it's the price for eBooks. A good example is Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: Kindle - $15 Paperback (new) - $10 Paperback (used) - $6 Paperback (library) - Free The Kindle version is a significant premium and I don't think there is a matching convenience factor. It's unfortunate that is the case because I'm sure it'd be a lot more eco-friendly and efficient to distribute ebooks.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#36Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
For a novel that I read in a mostly linear fashion? Love e-readers. For technical books where I’m using four fingers of my left hand to bookmark four different pages to flip back and forth to? Hate e-readers. They are simply far slower than paper at random access. For anything where I’d like to appreciate the artistry of the book or its contents? Hate e-readers.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#37Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
In short: I usually walk around with my current two or three books that I'm reading, plus several dozen Comfort Books that I could re-read for the Nth time if the mood strikes me, in a very convenient form-factor that doesn't need light.
On the other hand (as other people have said), I read complicated PDFs (usually role-playing game supplements), Comics, and technical books on a phone / laptop / tablet, depending on what's handy. In those cases it's not about the ergonomics of long-term reading, it's about having a responsive color screen.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#38Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
1) I always have my book with me. Have to wait 15 minutes in a waiting room, take out the phone. At home I have my nice large tablet.
2) Page sync works great. Read 10 pages on tablet and move to phone and it starts off on the correct page. Same when I switch back to the tablet.
3) Buying a new book is super simple and instant. (Note that if traveling internationally, be sure to buy/download extra books from home before you leave as Play may not sell you books if you are abroad. Reading always works.)
4) Free samples keep me from buying books I've already read or don't like.
5) You can import any books you already own and still get all of the above.
The only issue I have with standard tablets/phones is that full daylight reading kills batteries but you still get most of days usage so even this isn't that big of an issue. Not enough to switch back e-paper which is too single purpose for my wants/needs. Sure they are nice for reading by the pool but I can't look up were to eat lunch on it so I still need my phone with me which defeats the purpose.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#39Curious what people's views are on e-readers here at HN? Personally, I've tried to adopt an e-reader over many years. The convenience of having 100s of books without the weight is great. Being able to read in a dark room as well. However, the feel of a real book I think still wins out over any advantages of an e-reader. Also my informal and anecdotal survey of how people use technology - mainly on the NYC subway - do…
Being able to read in direct sunlight is a nice bonus.
Re: The Rise and Fall of Pixel QI
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a novel that I read in a mostly linear fashion? Love e-readers. For technical books where I’m using four fingers of my left hand to bookmark four different pages to flip back and forth to? Hate e-readers. They are simply far slower than paper at random access. For anything where I’d like to appreciate the artistry of the book or its contents? Hate e-readers.
E-readers provide full text search and unlimited bookmarks (usually with notes and/or highlighting). Multiple “finger” bookmarks brings back memories though!
That said, full text search is the one electronic UX element that I wish paper books had!