Live data from Hacker News

Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

unfortunately.tech

31–40 of 69 posts

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#31
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, the tendency to 'ghost' people is a huge problem in society now, and companies seem to prefer it to just saying 'no'. But it's especially bad when you've already gone through most of the application process beforehand. Being ghosted after a job application? Annoying, but possibly understandable if the demand was really high. Being ghosted after going through multiple interviews, a coding test and everyone basic…

> Yeah, the tendency to 'ghost' people is a huge problem in society now, and companies seem to prefer it to just saying 'no'. What do you think this is attributable to? Is it that technology has shortened our attention spans so much that we no longer encode the memories of recent experiences?

I think it's two reasons:

1) People are becoming super averse to conflict and, by extension, confrontation. I think it's for myriad reasons. Not wanting to deal with the possibly-negative response; being accused of something; the other party exacting some form of retribution; and so on. I think the perception is that if one party says "[not-preferred reply]," the other party feels maligned instead of just that "it didn't work out."

2) Along the same lines, I think not saying "no" is also seen as responsibility shifting. "Well, I didn't tell them 'yes' so they'll figure it out soon enough." And then the ghosted party is then held as being responsible for their own feelings. "Not my problem you felt bad that [a possible employer | an acquaintance | some other interaction] never called you back. Those are your feelings, not [mine | ours]."

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#32

When I was job hunting I sincerely appreciated any rejection letter at any stage of the process, be it automated or personal. Obviously an offer letter would be better but the absolute worst is hearing nothing back. We should be praising the companies that take the time (or implement the automated process) to send the rejection letters and not leave us hanging.

No the _worst_ is when they offer you the job verbally on the phone and in between the phone call and the written offer they give the job to someone else.

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#33

"We're sorry, but something went wrong." Looks like the website rejected me :(

I get the same thing, and DownForEveryone tells me "It's just you. unfortunately.tech is up..." So invalidating. :-) https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/unfortunately.tech

It is up, it just happens to be serving an error message instead of the content you want :)

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#34
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Yeah, the tendency to 'ghost' people is a huge problem in society now, and companies seem to prefer it to just saying 'no'. What do you think this is attributable to? Is it that technology has shortened our attention spans so much that we no longer encode the memories of recent experiences?

If a company doesn't hire you, then by definition they have determined that your time is of no value to them, so it would literally be a waste of their resources to interact with you further.

Unless you consider the company's reputation and good will a resource...

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#35

When I was job hunting I sincerely appreciated any rejection letter at any stage of the process, be it automated or personal. Obviously an offer letter would be better but the absolute worst is hearing nothing back. We should be praising the companies that take the time (or implement the automated process) to send the rejection letters and not leave us hanging.

I have no problem being ghosted. The thing that really pisses me off, though, is receiving a rejection letter six weeks after the fact.

I got one today. It's okay: I got the message. I'm already gainfully employed elsewhere. You didn't need to send me a little reminder that I'm not good enough for your cool kids' club.

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#36
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a company doesn't hire you, then by definition they have determined that your time is of no value to them, so it would literally be a waste of their resources to interact with you further.

Unless you consider the company's reputation and good will a resource...

Except this is already standard operating procedure for most companies, and it doesn't seem to have affected them.

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#37

When I was job hunting I sincerely appreciated any rejection letter at any stage of the process, be it automated or personal. Obviously an offer letter would be better but the absolute worst is hearing nothing back. We should be praising the companies that take the time (or implement the automated process) to send the rejection letters and not leave us hanging.

I don't know if feedback is provided as standard where I work, or only on request - but we do provide meaningful feedback as far as possible.

I suggest that few companies will object to you asking about their timeframe for decisions, or (once that has expired) asking for feedback. Some companies won't be set up to provide it, which is unfortunate, but I suspect many will.

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#38
post #35

When I was job hunting I sincerely appreciated any rejection letter at any stage of the process, be it automated or personal. Obviously an offer letter would be better but the absolute worst is hearing nothing back. We should be praising the companies that take the time (or implement the automated process) to send the rejection letters and not leave us hanging.

I have no problem being ghosted. The thing that really pisses me off, though, is receiving a rejection letter six weeks after the fact. I got one today. It's okay: I got the message. I'm already gainfully employed elsewhere. You didn't need to send me a little reminder that I'm not good enough for your cool kids' club.

It's a bit silly to send one so late, but I'd rather get some word back rather than absolutely nothing.

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#39
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unless you consider the company's reputation and good will a resource...

Except this is already standard operating procedure for most companies, and it doesn't seem to have affected them.

It probably does affect them, though, whether they're aware of it or not. Some of the best talent they can get probably reads HN threads like these. A prospective great employee could easily read this thread, see stories of company X ghosting people, and decide to avoid them.

Re: Unfortunately.tech – a collection of rejection letters

#40
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no problem being ghosted. The thing that really pisses me off, though, is receiving a rejection letter six weeks after the fact. I got one today. It's okay: I got the message. I'm already gainfully employed elsewhere. You didn't need to send me a little reminder that I'm not good enough for your cool kids' club.

It's a bit silly to send one so late, but I'd rather get some word back rather than absolutely nothing.

Not for an initial resume that was never responded-to.

If we've never spoken before then it's really not necessary to send me a form-rejection. I'm not holding my breath.

Post reply on HN