Live data from Hacker News

You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

techcrunch.com

31–40 of 74 posts

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#31

Good cofounder > solo > bad cofounder. Pretty simple.

I have to agree and add this: many solo companies are this way not necessarily out of choice , but because the founders could not, for various reasons, get someone to work with them (overlapping skill set, lack of required skill set, a fear of uncertainty, low finances, incompatible personalities, other commitments, geography etc)

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#32
Whether you need a co-founder or not is not about individuals, it's about the skills. To make a startup successful you need to have the required skills; if you are lucky enough to have those skills in a single person, you don't need a co-founder.

As a side-note, the exact skills you need will depend on which metric you use to become successful (e.g. whether you want to bootstrap a self-sustainable company, or if you are happy with quick growth, raising money and exiting), but generally you need skills to build the product(s), and the skills to sell them. I personally couldn't sell my way out of a paper bag, but could build pretty much anything based on software and Internet. My attempts to build a startup failed precisely because I didn't have a hustler on the team, and I gave given up on trying again unless I can either a) find one, or b) build something that sells itself.

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#33

Whether you need a co-founder or not is not about individuals, it's about the skills. To make a startup successful you need to have the required skills; if you are lucky enough to have those skills in a single person, you don't need a co-founder. As a side-note, the exact skills you need will depend on which metric you use to become successful (e.g. whether you want to bootstrap a self-sustainable company, or if you…

Eh, depending on the depth of knowledge required to build your startup I believe the skills required to get your project off the ground can be learned.

Beyond that point you can hire.

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#34
post #18

The idea is that startups are very hard work and you need someone to bounce your ideas off, do some heavy lifting, who is also completely supportive of your success. Someone who pulls you back up when you hit the floor hard. My theory has often been that many "solo founders" actually get some very strong support elsewhere - whether it's their spouse or a relative. A lot of the more modern VC companies target very you…

They absolutely do get strong support elsewhere.

I would argue even teams of co-founders require a diverse support network! Relying on only your team is putting all of your eggs in one basket and superficially restricting the diversity of views you need to be innovative.

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#36
I think one of the key words in the title is "you". All the stats are fine, but it doesn't say much about what "you" need. This depends on what type of person you are, what type of skills you have and lack, how much you know about the industry you are in, what type of business you are starting, how good your network is, etc. I think the stats are nice to have, but the most important thing is being self-aware and knowing what is best for you.

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#37
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not just that. Defining a successful startup as a startup that exited is a bit narrow of a definition. A bootstrapped startup that has sustainable growth and can remain independent is successful in my book.

Not quite. The point of a startup is to get rich and then not think about money. It's why people endure the pain. (It wasn't till I tried starting one that I realized just how painful it is.) A bootstrapped startup that you stop paying attention to will rapidly stop making money.

Once you make enough money you can sell off a bootstrapped business or at worse just run it out for cash.

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#39
post #18

The idea is that startups are very hard work and you need someone to bounce your ideas off, do some heavy lifting, who is also completely supportive of your success. Someone who pulls you back up when you hit the floor hard. My theory has often been that many "solo founders" actually get some very strong support elsewhere - whether it's their spouse or a relative. A lot of the more modern VC companies target very you…

This is not necessarily the case. If you are bootstrapping you can afford to go at a slower pace that is more compatible with life outside of crazy pace of investor backed startups.

I personally bootstrapped mark II of my business while working full time with a wife and family who all thought I was crazy. It just took me a little longer than if I had been working 100 hours a week with a co-founder.

One of the good things about going slower is you have more time to think through problems and you can get by with less feedback from others (i.e. you have the time to solve your own problems).

Re: You don’t actually need a co-founder (2016)

#40

Whether you need a co-founder or not is not about individuals, it's about the skills. To make a startup successful you need to have the required skills; if you are lucky enough to have those skills in a single person, you don't need a co-founder. As a side-note, the exact skills you need will depend on which metric you use to become successful (e.g. whether you want to bootstrap a self-sustainable company, or if you…

If you are bright(ish) you can figure almost all of the needed skills with a bit of reading and practice. I taught myself everything I needed to make a success of my business from software development, devops, accounting, tax, marketing, sales, etc. Sure I made more than a few mistakes, but I didn’t run across anything insurmountable.

Sales is an interesting skill. People will buy from pretty bad sales people if the sales person is a) knowledgeable and b) genuine. As a founder you should be both so as long as you get out and meet potential clients (or pick up the phone) you will sell as well as any skilled sales person. The skill that good professional sales people have is selling when they don’t know or care about the product.

Don’t ever think you can't be an effective sales person for the company you founded and built. Every founder can sell as long as they try.

Post reply on HN