Live data from Hacker News

Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

sivers.org

31–40 of 54 posts

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#31
post #29

Well, the debunking of many of Daniel Kahneman's insights was covered here earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15228712 I would everything on whatever this list is with a huge grain of salt along with any other social-science heavy book.

Many? The link only talks about chapter 4 of his book Thinking, Fast and Slow.

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#32
post #2

Surprised to find this here. For what it's worth, for anyone interested, a few things: #1 : That list is sorted with my top recommendations up top. You can also click to re-sort it by newest or by name, but by default, I highly recommend the ones at the top of the list. #2 : These aren't summaries of the book! These are just the little points that I personally found surprising or inspiring. If a book wasn't surprisin…

How do you read so many books? I want to get into the habit of reading more but I always seems to struggle finding the time.

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#33

Nice. I've read a bunch of books and I'm also looking to make something like this. Just a question: I'm not an American, how does copyright work for things like this? Can I write something like a "10 things I learned from " with a few (like < 20) lines copied (or should I paraphrase it?) from the book?

I’d also like to know the answer to this question. My interpretation is that adding some commentary alongside lines copied from the book would fall under Fair Use of Copyrighted Material. But it’s so gray.

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#34
post #19

I would not recommend this as a book list. There is just one book here written before about the year 2000. If you are not reading a regular amount of classics, you are doomed to be historically parochial. Some people will love these books. If you are not already in that category, I would urge you not to go there. Pop social science and business self-help books are like chocolate - healthy in small doses, as part of a…

> If you are not reading a regular amount of classics, you are doomed to be historically parochial.

Precisely. Often, I cannot relate to classics, and therefore end up feeling let down and questioning the hype. But the reason it is a classic is because it stood out from peers at the time. It is this quality of classics that I believe you are referring to.

> Pop social science and business self-help books are like chocolate - healthy in small doses, as part of a balanced diet.

I suppose it's more like sugar for the brain. Too much of it is bad. But I see what you mean.

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#35
post #2

Surprised to find this here. For what it's worth, for anyone interested, a few things: #1 : That list is sorted with my top recommendations up top. You can also click to re-sort it by newest or by name, but by default, I highly recommend the ones at the top of the list. #2 : These aren't summaries of the book! These are just the little points that I personally found surprising or inspiring. If a book wasn't surprisin…

Given how extensive your notes are on most of those books, it would be interesting to know what process you have to take them while reading. I've always been a very lean note-taker and find this is the reasons I quickly forget many valuable insights from the books I read. Any tips?

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#37
post #20

Wow, that is a lot of self help, is it too much?

No amount of self help books is too much, because they have no effect anyway.

If I said the same about technical documentation, I bet you'd tell me I was either reading it wrong or I wasn't the target audience in the first place.

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#38
post #2

Surprised to find this here. For what it's worth, for anyone interested, a few things: #1 : That list is sorted with my top recommendations up top. You can also click to re-sort it by newest or by name, but by default, I highly recommend the ones at the top of the list. #2 : These aren't summaries of the book! These are just the little points that I personally found surprising or inspiring. If a book wasn't surprisin…

Derek, as you probably already know, most of your writing is of great inspiration for many people, including me. I have tried to create a list of "books I've read" like you, and I failed (many excuses not to do it, apparently). I think it's a great exercise per se, besides whether people would find it interesting or not. I promise I will give it another try :) p.s. I highly recommend 1491 and 1493, two of my all-time…

What are 1491 and 1493?

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#39
post #2

Surprised to find this here. For what it's worth, for anyone interested, a few things: #1 : That list is sorted with my top recommendations up top. You can also click to re-sort it by newest or by name, but by default, I highly recommend the ones at the top of the list. #2 : These aren't summaries of the book! These are just the little points that I personally found surprising or inspiring. If a book wasn't surprisin…

I'm a pitifully slow reader, I like to stop often and think about new concepts or insights so I can internalize them better. This way of reading is my biggest obstacle in finishing books. I've tried speeding reading and while I can finish chapters faster, I retain much less information like ~40% of concepts.

Any tips for readers like me? Thank you for the wonderful list, I'd like to get through it in this decade if possible :(

Re: Derek Sivers: Books I've Read

#40
post #20

Wow, that is a lot of self help, is it too much?

No amount of self help books is too much, because they have no effect anyway.

I love this. Just as cigarette packs state: "Smoking kills", self-help books should state "This book will have no effect".
Post reply on HN