A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
31–40 of 51 posts
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#32They moved and rotated an Indiana Bell building in the 1930s.
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#33Zero-downtime deployments 1950s style.
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#34Impressive feat - however, I was puzzled by this: > Naturally, some of the workers were nervous about this idea. Matute Remus was sympathetic to their concerns, and wanted to reassure these operators and make them feel safe. So his wife Esmeralda agreed to also go into the building while it was being moved. She even took along their seven-year-old son, Juan Jorge. Maybe this could work as a publicity stunt to persuad…
You are correct in that… however I think that this harkens back to "talk is cheap, actions lead." That is, it is very easy to say "this is safe" even if you don't think that it is. By putting something that you value on the line, then you are showing your level of commitment to the statement that "this is safe". I think that you will find it is not the "technical experts" who were afraid, but the workers in the build…
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#35Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#36Reminds me of the raising of Chicago in the 1850-60s https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_of_Chicago
I was floored to see shopkeeps still open while they moved the building . Today, OSHA would have a heart attack.
> Consequently, the practice of putting the old multi-story, intact and furnished wooden buildings—sometimes entire rows of them en bloc—on rollers and moving them to the outskirts of town or to the suburbs was so common as to be considered nothing more than routine traffic.
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
There used to be a show in the US about moving houses - generally they were wooden houses and moved a mile or so to either a new part of town or another town. I think the huge wide (and pretty empty looking) roads helped - I can't think of many cases where you'd be able to do similar in the UK due to the narrow roads. Plus I'd rather move a wooden house than a brick or even a stone one.
It's fairly common to relocate houses in New Zealand, up to a couple of hundred km away. Wooden buildings built on piles used to be the standard construction method in New Zealand before poured concrete bases became the norm, so they're relatively easy to move: just chop the piles and jack it up onto a truck. My parent's friends actually gave a house away for free. They were rebuilding, it it was cheaper to give the…
https://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/capital-life/74342852/...
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#38https://www.indystar.com/story/news/history/retroindy/2014/0... They moved and rotated an Indiana Bell building in the 1930s.
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#39I didn't see it mentioned there, so I have to ask: what about the cabling? Depending on where the telephone cables entered the building, they would have to get up to 12 meters longer. How did they make that work? Did they splice every cable? Or did the cables already have enough slack?
Re: A 1700-ton telco building that was relocated while running in 1950
#40I saw the same thing being done with a theatre in Manhattan in 1998 (to make way for the Disneyfication of Times Square) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_Theatre_(42nd_Street)
I really do not miss all the sex shops and prostitutes, pushers and all around hustlers who used to have a run of the place. I for one am glad they cleaned that up.