Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same reason they're the first to work with CRISPR in humans, despite the US having a formerly vast R&D lead. It's because they're fundamentally a lot less concerned about killing people in the process. There's a reasonable debate to be had on whether the US is too concerned with the risk aspect of making progress on biotech.
> fundamentally a lot less concerned about killing people in the process That's rather flippant, and I'd like to provide a counterpoint. Some neuroscience researchers held a town hall discussion in a major US city and also in a major Chinese city (on two different occasions) about bioethics, and one of the topics discussed was whether it was morally right or wrong (in the case of IVF) to screen for IQ, assuming we ha…
If anything it supports the previous comment.