Live data from Hacker News

Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

teslasuit.io

31–40 of 110 posts

Re: Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

#32

"Teslasuit, n. A subpoena from Elon Musk's trademark attorneys"

That's not the way trademarks work.. Tesla has a trademark only in the fields they compete in: solar, cars, batteries. They can't stop you from starting Tesla Coffee Shop, or (in this case) Tesla VR suit.

Re: Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

#34

Hey all, Denis, Teslasuit Marketing Director here. Looking forward to your questions! as for feedback for users - we have it on Youtube - just google it by keyword phrase "Teslasuit VR haptic suit at DevGAMM 2017 Minsk" as for prefix Tesla - we using it due to the fact that we are using current (EMS and TENS) to provide haptic (sense of touch) as for electricity: yes, we are using TENS and EMS to provide haptic sensa…

Estimate for what the cost is going to be, initially and eventually?

Re: Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

#37

"Teslasuit, n. A subpoena from Elon Musk's trademark attorneys"

That's not the way trademarks work.. Tesla has a trademark only in the fields they compete in: solar, cars, batteries. They can't stop you from starting Tesla Coffee Shop, or (in this case) Tesla VR suit.

Tesla VR suit name is creating a recipe for failure: if you think you can make a long-term viable VR suit company without ever using batteries (always tethered!) limits future growth potential greatly.

Re: Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

#38
post #35

Putting "Tesla" in the name seems like you're trying to use the carmaker's brand to bolster your own brand. Kind of shady.

But an electric carmaker using the name Tesla seems disingenuous in the first place.

What if I used "Turing" as the name of my cybersecurity/AI company?

Re: Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

#39

"Teslasuit, n. A subpoena from Elon Musk's trademark attorneys"

That's not the way trademarks work.. Tesla has a trademark only in the fields they compete in: solar, cars, batteries. They can't stop you from starting Tesla Coffee Shop, or (in this case) Tesla VR suit.

I was mostly being facetious, but the reality is that things are a little more complicated than that in the trademark business.

The court will start by asking one question along the lines of, "Is there a good chance that a typical customer in the market for either product will be confused regarding the origin of the goods?" The weasel words in that question will leave plenty of room for argument on both sides.

(IANAL, but have had cause to look into this question recently.)

Re: Teslasuit – full body haptic VR suit

#40
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not the way trademarks work.. Tesla has a trademark only in the fields they compete in: solar, cars, batteries. They can't stop you from starting Tesla Coffee Shop, or (in this case) Tesla VR suit.

Tesla VR suit name is creating a recipe for failure: if you think you can make a long-term viable VR suit company without ever using batteries (always tethered!) limits future growth potential greatly.

That's also not the way trademarks work. To violate Tesla's trademark they need compete in the battery market.

Trademarks don't get you rights to every market that utilizes the type of item you sell.

Post reply on HN