Live data from Hacker News

Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

medium.com

31–40 of 65 posts

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#31
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When & where do you think the Industrial Revolution happened?

Started late 18th century, after several decades of European countries and US states abolishing slavery ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slave... ). Why, when do you think it happened?

[deleted]

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#32
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When & where do you think the Industrial Revolution happened?

Started late 18th century, after several decades of European countries and US states abolishing slavery ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slave... ). Why, when do you think it happened?

Serfdom was completely ended in England 200 years before the Industrial Revolution, and while slaves were still present in England, they were never a significant part of the labor pool. What other conditions had to be met, or is it simply a matter of waiting two centuries after eliminating slaves/serfs from the labor pool?

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When & where do you think the Industrial Revolution happened?

The most obvious example of the negative influence of slavery on industrialization is the split of the early US into free and slave economies, and the near complete failure of the slave economy to industrialize.

I'm not saying the elimination of slavery/serfdom isn't a necessary precursor; I just don't think it was a sufficient condition. What is the complete set of necessary and sufficient preconditions to have an Industrial Revolution?

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#34
The article doesn't mention the printing press. The invention of the press fueled explosive growth, because printers printed handbooks on anything and everything, and so knowledge became cheap and widely available. My personal view is the IR started with the printing press.

We're in the middle of a second IR caused by the internet, for analogous reasons.

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#36
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Are you arguing slavery prevents industrial resolutions? > Didn't they coexist in some parts of the world? The American Civil War is an example of the two coexisting in the same country

The free states industrialized, and the slave states did not.

I mean... that ended with the devastation of the slave states.

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#37
post #2

Rome was still primarily a slave/servant based economy, and one based on expansion and conquest. They lacked the mathematical and scientific foundations to radically change metallurgy, chemistry, and the other basics of industry. This article focuses a lot on economic possibilities and social change necessary for a revolution, while largely ignoring larger issues. You cant have an industrial revolution without then r…

Up until quite late, metallurgy was more experimentation and experience than scientific practice. If they'd decently understood their materials, there probably wouldn't have been so many people injured or killed by exploding boilers.

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#38
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Started late 18th century, after several decades of European countries and US states abolishing slavery ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slave... ). Why, when do you think it happened?

Serfdom was completely ended in England 200 years before the Industrial Revolution, and while slaves were still present in England, they were never a significant part of the labor pool. What other conditions had to be met, or is it simply a matter of waiting two centuries after eliminating slaves/serfs from the labor pool?

My point was that it sounds likely that something like the industrial revolution would happen after the abolishment of slavery, when there's more pressure on people to be inventive. Not that it has to happen immediately

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#39
post #2

Rome was still primarily a slave/servant based economy, and one based on expansion and conquest. They lacked the mathematical and scientific foundations to radically change metallurgy, chemistry, and the other basics of industry. This article focuses a lot on economic possibilities and social change necessary for a revolution, while largely ignoring larger issues. You cant have an industrial revolution without then r…

> Rome was still primarily a slave/servant based economy, and one based on expansion and conquest. They lacked the mathematical and scientific foundations to radically change metallurgy, chemistry, and the other basics of industry.

The book the article is inspired by[0] is an alternate history set during the reign of Augustus. It takes as its point of departure the capture of Archimedes of Syracuse -- instead of being killed, he is brought back to Rome.

Note that this is the mid-Republic period, before the dynamics of conquest and slavery completely dominated the Roman economy.

The book is written by Helen Dale, who set out to write a legal alt-history, not an economics alt-history per se. She's got the background for it: she's an award-winning novelist, studied classics at Oxford and Roman law at Edinburgh. My gut feeling is that any objection you have, she's thought about already.

[0] https://www.amazon.com/Kingdom-Wicked-Book-One-Rules/dp/0994...

Re: Could Rome Have Had an Industrial Revolution?

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The most obvious example of the negative influence of slavery on industrialization is the split of the early US into free and slave economies, and the near complete failure of the slave economy to industrialize.

I'm not saying the elimination of slavery/serfdom isn't a necessary precursor; I just don't think it was a sufficient condition. What is the complete set of necessary and sufficient preconditions to have an Industrial Revolution?

I don't know if this is a complete set, but:

1. economic freedom

2. printing press

3. a view of the universe that it follows rules that can be discovered and modeled in the small

4. the scientific method

5. protection of property rights, enforcement of contracts, rule of law rather than corruption

Post reply on HN