Live data from Hacker News

Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

techdirt.com

31–40 of 99 posts

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#31

> However, if you go to his house on 11 Tee Pee Row, you will unfortunately speak to a kind person who will tell you that John has been passed away since 2016 and no one else there has the same name. This is my new favorite name for a residential street.

If net neutrality is axed I'm moving to Berlin to live on Max-Beer street. With HN throttled I'll need a new addiction.

HN is so fast I use it to test my internet issues. It’ll be hard to throttle it.

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#32
post #4

I'd just like to point out, hopefully without being accused of shilling, that part of Net Neutrality legislation involves the quiet reclassification of ISPs as title ii common carriers. These are regulations designed for phone companies in the 1930s. Why should you worry? Because all network traffic will be subject to extremely broad obscenity laws. I will try to find the legislation shortly, but effectively, causing…

I've been trying to tell people this for a while - I do believe in net neutrality, but the title II classification is a boondoggle, and those laws need serious rewrite. I'm not seriously concerned about getting arrested for downloading pornography - When was the last time you heard of someone getting arrested for shouting "Fuck!" over the phone? - But I am concerned that those laws were written for Bell Telephone, an…

Perfect is the enemy of good. At this point, we can't even get them reclassified as title 2. I doubt there's the will power and civility to come up with a whole new set of laws that are reasonable and designed around the public's best interest.

But, I would be happy if my cynicism gets proven wrong.

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#33

It is fairly clear at this point that FCC as an agency is a captive of business interests. It should be treated as openly hostile to the interests of the general public.

You might say that of most governmental agencies and the Congress as well.

The U$ is an oligarchy in all but name.

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#35
post #16

Being we've had foreign governments messing with our democracy using social media and hacking, this should be fully investigated. I'm not claiming they are interfering, only saying we should rule out the possibility using our best forensics.

>messing with our democracy The U.S. has had a flawed democracy regardless of foreign meddling. Americans do not even elect their president directly. Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index#Democracy_Inde...

I’m sure you’ve heard this before, but I can’t let the response go unsaid: democracy does not require direct elections. The founding fathers were not naive idiots who didn’t know how to design an election.

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#36
post #16

Being we've had foreign governments messing with our democracy using social media and hacking, this should be fully investigated. I'm not claiming they are interfering, only saying we should rule out the possibility using our best forensics.

>messing with our democracy The U.S. has had a flawed democracy regardless of foreign meddling. Americans do not even elect their president directly. Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index#Democracy_Inde...

That's a bit of a red herring, don't you think? Of course the problems in American democracy can't be reduced to a single source, but that's not what was being said. Simply that foreign interference is certainly a proven problem

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#37
post #16

Being we've had foreign governments messing with our democracy using social media and hacking, this should be fully investigated. I'm not claiming they are interfering, only saying we should rule out the possibility using our best forensics.

>messing with our democracy The U.S. has had a flawed democracy regardless of foreign meddling. Americans do not even elect their president directly. Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index#Democracy_Inde...

If by "flawed" you mean it isn't a true democracy, I would say that I don't think it was ever intended to be one. It was designed to function as a republic and prevent mob rule.

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#38
post #4

I'd just like to point out, hopefully without being accused of shilling, that part of Net Neutrality legislation involves the quiet reclassification of ISPs as title ii common carriers. These are regulations designed for phone companies in the 1930s. Why should you worry? Because all network traffic will be subject to extremely broad obscenity laws. I will try to find the legislation shortly, but effectively, causing…

Apparently this was an argument brought up back in 2014 as well[1]. While it focuses more on TV and porn instead of phones and 4chan, in the end the FCC only managed to actually use this power via the nature of the medium (since TV uses spectrum). The only internet that could fall under this is mobile internet, which already doesn't fall under net neutrality (since a lot of carriers have been introducing zero-rating for plans for awhile now without resistance).

[1]https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140623/07052927656/rep-i...

Re: Dead People Mysteriously Support the FCC's Attack on Net Neutrality

#39

After saying that, yeah, an investigation is due...maybe laws were broken, but I can say that I used a dead person name as a way to be anon. In the end this should not matter, FCC is not running a vote. If they count pro /against this way then it's their problem. Arguments should be the only deciding factor.

> In the end this should not matter, FCC is not running a vote.

Perhaps. But would you expect the FCC to actually sift through millions of stuffed comments just to get to the few good ones?

By stuffing the system with trash comments, the submitters effectively guaranteed that the FCC won't bother to read any of the comments.

Post reply on HN