I would of went for NOTnsfw.com It is still available. http://www.whois.net/dnr/index.php?d=notnsfw&tld=com
My favorite available one is:
safeftw.com: "safe for the work" OR "safe for the win"
31–35 of 35 posts
I would of went for NOTnsfw.com It is still available. http://www.whois.net/dnr/index.php?d=notnsfw&tld=com
My favorite available one is:
safeftw.com: "safe for the work" OR "safe for the win"
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, you have to put it in a different way :-) IMHO you have to offer the more private option (regardless of your monetization plan) just to get the early adopters who usually are geekier than the masses and hence care about privacy.
Thanks for the inputs. I had anticipated privacy concerns, but in all fairness, this is an early prototype.
This is the crucial thing: Unrated links default to Safe-For-Work. The extension becomes useless if the ratings don't keep up with content (in other words, if some dude posts a nudie picture of his girlfriend, it's got to be rated before I get to it or your extension doesn't help me).
Seems like this should be settable. If I want to be uber-cautious, not rated should default to NSFW. Also, maybe a white/black list of domains the user knows to be safe/unsafe for themselves?
If you can't give some sense of confidence that the tool will prevent that scenario, then it's usefulness is limited.