Why not Apache 2.0 though? That would have been a logical choice.
Apache 2.0 has a patent grant from my understanding.
31–40 of 528 posts
Why not Apache 2.0 though? That would have been a logical choice.
Apache 2.0 has a patent grant from my understanding.
Why not Apache 2.0 though? That would have been a logical choice.
For what it's worth, the software that I'm developing at a Big 4 is released under the Apache 2.0 license.
Looks like React Native isn't included in the list for a license update.
That's what gets me. There's a very narrow list of packages that they've selected for the MIT treatment. Why isn't the blog post something along the lines of "We're re-licensing all of our open source libraries under the MIT License and removing their patent clauses"? It seems like they're still trying to play games, and are only buckling to the pressure for a tiny number of libraries.
> This shift naturally raises questions about the rest of Facebook's open source projects. Many of our popular projects will keep the BSD + Patents license for now. We're evaluating those projects' licenses too, but each project is different and alternative licensing options will depend on a variety of factors.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's what gets me. There's a very narrow list of packages that they've selected for the MIT treatment. Why isn't the blog post something along the lines of "We're re-licensing all of our open source libraries under the MIT License and removing their patent clauses"? It seems like they're still trying to play games, and are only buckling to the pressure for a tiny number of libraries.
My less cynical view (hope) maybe react-native isn't due for an update soon and they'll do it next time there's a version bump?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's what gets me. There's a very narrow list of packages that they've selected for the MIT treatment. Why isn't the blog post something along the lines of "We're re-licensing all of our open source libraries under the MIT License and removing their patent clauses"? It seems like they're still trying to play games, and are only buckling to the pressure for a tiny number of libraries.
See the fourth paragraph. > This shift naturally raises questions about the rest of Facebook's open source projects. Many of our popular projects will keep the BSD + Patents license for now. We're evaluating those projects' licenses too, but each project is different and alternative licensing options will depend on a variety of factors.
Thank you, Wordpress.[1] [1] https://ma.tt/2017/09/on-react-and-wordpress/