Live data from Hacker News

COVFEFE Act

en.wikipedia.org

31–33 of 33 posts

Re: COVFEFE Act

#31
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand there might be a crazy upside somewhere in the future (for example, the COVFEFE ACT). This can be done only in hindsight. The risk, imo, was way too high to do anything but cash out at the moment.

My point is that with the proper sort of marketing, you should be able to sell a LOT of merchandise to Trump haters out there. Imagine being in year 3 of Trump's presidency and still making money off this signature blunder. We aren't even through year 1! Imagine 20 years from now, when people are able to pin-point "COVFEFE" as a signature moment in Trump's campaign (just like Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky). Imagin…

The flip side of that coin is that no one remembers that moment. Only time can tell. I think it's a matter of placing your bets where you think it is most probable that you will win the most. I personally don't believe that the statements yoh made will be true. The owner thinks otherwise.

Re: COVFEFE Act

#32
This is a real issue. It is very depressing to find out that only thing I have ever done is two pieces of paper in 1970s. National Archives (of Finland) do not recognize any other form of publications than those on paper. In this case very shitty paper "printed" about 10 times with a Xerox-machine.

Re: COVFEFE Act

#33
post #5

Just to put my mind at rest..."Despite the constant negative press covfefe."...we all agree Trump meant 'coverage' right?

That makes more sense than "kerfuffle" (I feel dumb now).

I shall henceforth read "covfefe" as "kerfuffle". Thank you, dear sir.
Post reply on HN