Why it is better than offline editor (like TeXnicCenter) and code repository (like Git)?
ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
31–40 of 70 posts
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Overleaf founder here: We’re going to make sure that there is still an open source version that you can download and run yourself. We’re still working out the details of how we’ll do that, but if that involves open sourcing parts of Overleaf, then that's what we'll do.
Almost all of my team has individual subscriptions to sharelatex because we felt it was better from a books perspective to show there is more individual interest in an open source solution than corporate interest. We specifically chose sharelatex instead of overleaf so we could host our own instance. We've largely moved away from using sharelatex but still keep our subscriptions active as a form of support for contin…
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#33Why it is better than offline editor (like TeXnicCenter) and code repository (like Git)?
I prefer for 1gb+ of latex code to not touch my laptop if I can avoid it.
LaTeX is from the 80s. I understand it has grown over time, but to >1GB? That's huge, even for modern standards, for just a typesetting program. The documentation is a dependency that seems to be forced on you (it's not an optional dependency in Debian), and fonts are also big. But even without that, you're left with about 600MB if I recall correctly which is still huge for just formatting text right?
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#34Why it is better than offline editor (like TeXnicCenter) and code repository (like Git)?
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#35Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
I prefer for 1gb+ of latex code to not touch my laptop if I can avoid it.
Yeah that seems like a huge thing anyway. LaTeX is from the 80s. I understand it has grown over time, but to >1GB? That's huge, even for modern standards, for just a typesetting program. The documentation is a dependency that seems to be forced on you (it's not an optional dependency in Debian), and fonts are also big. But even without that, you're left with about 600MB if I recall correctly which is still huge for j…
I am quite happy to dedicate 1GB to that. Especially in a world, where random websites tend to dump 3-4MB on me (with liberal use of adblockers) to render a few paragraphs of text.
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Overleaf founder here: We’re going to make sure that there is still an open source version that you can download and run yourself. We’re still working out the details of how we’ll do that, but if that involves open sourcing parts of Overleaf, then that's what we'll do.
OverLeaf user here. Thank you. It's awesome.
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#38Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#39I hope that the documentation for ShareLaTeX stays online; of all the resources on LaTeX available, their documention stands above the rest in terms of clarity. The other day, I wanted to know how to do a proper quote, made a quick Google search, and I was happy that the first result was ShareLaTeX and I found the answer to my question.
Re: ShareLaTeX Joins Overleaf
#40I love ShareLatex. What is going to happen to existing customers?