Live data from Hacker News

Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

techcrunch.com

31–40 of 121 posts

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#31

I'm one of the authors of this post and plan on releasing an updated version with some companies that we missed on the first pass. If you know of other substantial startups that went far before raising capital, please let me know: JoeFlaherty@FounderCollective. The current list of misses includes: + Grammarly + 37 Signals/Basecamp + Zip Recruiter + Outcome Health + Wistia Who else?

i'm sure you've seen the interviews on indiehackers.com, but there are many more bootstrapped companies on their way up! many to watch out for.

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#32

I'm one of the authors of this post and plan on releasing an updated version with some companies that we missed on the first pass. If you know of other substantial startups that went far before raising capital, please let me know: JoeFlaherty@FounderCollective. The current list of misses includes: + Grammarly + 37 Signals/Basecamp + Zip Recruiter + Outcome Health + Wistia Who else?

Craiglist generates tons of cash, wildly profitable, no investment

Bose has always funded itself via profits for 50 years with no outside investment. $3b-$4b revenue last year.

Beats waited 4-5 years and was huge before taking first equity investment from HTC

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#33

I'm one of the authors of this post and plan on releasing an updated version with some companies that we missed on the first pass. If you know of other substantial startups that went far before raising capital, please let me know: JoeFlaherty@FounderCollective. The current list of misses includes: + Grammarly + 37 Signals/Basecamp + Zip Recruiter + Outcome Health + Wistia Who else?

Craiglist generates tons of cash, wildly profitable, no investment Bose has always funded itself via profits for 50 years with no outside investment. $3b-$4b revenue last year. Beats waited 4-5 years and was huge before taking first equity investment from HTC

All good examples! Thanks so much!

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#34
post #5

Invisible, indeed. My interest timed out before any such corporation was named. It was kind of interesting watching the layout dynamically rearrange itself over and over. If this isn't readable on a recent Android phone with a decent net connection then who are these articles for anyway?

The page renders absolutely fine even with JS disabled on my iPhone: just vanilla HTML and CSS.

Maybe try disabling JS on your phone. I can't imagine what could have caused the problems you describe on this site; TechCrunch still practices progressive enhancement.

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#35
post #8

> Wayfair: The home goods e-commerce company was profitable from its first month of operation because they skipped brand advertising and bought up hundreds of domain names that were exact matches for common search terms. I remember buying a TV stand from TVStands.com about a decade ago.

So, how did they convert all those sites over to wayfair.com without losing a lot of Google link juice?

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#36

I'm one of the authors of this post and plan on releasing an updated version with some companies that we missed on the first pass. If you know of other substantial startups that went far before raising capital, please let me know: JoeFlaherty@FounderCollective. The current list of misses includes: + Grammarly + 37 Signals/Basecamp + Zip Recruiter + Outcome Health + Wistia Who else?

Craiglist generates tons of cash, wildly profitable, no investment Bose has always funded itself via profits for 50 years with no outside investment. $3b-$4b revenue last year. Beats waited 4-5 years and was huge before taking first equity investment from HTC

Wasn't Beats founded by a celebrity? I feel like this kind of goes against the spirit of the list.

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#37

I'm one of the authors of this post and plan on releasing an updated version with some companies that we missed on the first pass. If you know of other substantial startups that went far before raising capital, please let me know: JoeFlaherty@FounderCollective. The current list of misses includes: + Grammarly + 37 Signals/Basecamp + Zip Recruiter + Outcome Health + Wistia Who else?

Valve

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#38
Isn't this the way companies, until fairly recently, have always been started and grown? Basically, come up with an idea/product, reach around to back pocket (or into your purse) and fund it ad-hoc. That, or take out a loan or such.

It seems like this was the way things were always done - until fairly recently. It seems like things changed sometime around the early 1990s. I tend to wonder if this had anything to do with the S&L scandals and such, plus the recession at the time? I think (maybe I'm wrong) that at that time, banks started to push credit more, and making non-mortgage loans more difficult or impossible to get (I recall my dad getting a loan from the bank to buy a car, with the house as collateral - I don't think that's even possible today).

So today, if you want to take this route, you either have to go old-school and fund it with loans from friends and family (more or less), or find some other kind of small-time investors (non-VC), or use savings, or maybe credit cards or mortgage equity. All have upsides and downsides (for the business, owner, and "investors"). But it isn't as easy any longer to go to a local bank to get a loan to start a business (you'll probably just get pushed to get a business line of credit instead).

I'm probably completely wrong about all of this, though - which is why I don't have my own business, on top of a bunch of other reasons!

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#39
post #13

Microsoft is pretty close too. Founded in 1975, issued stock in 1981 (5% to an investor, the rest to founders and employees), IPO in 1986 Source: http://www.techntechie.com/early-investors-in-microsoft-you-...

Microsoft is also interesting for the amount of wealth it created for regular employees via stock...10,000 millionaires in 1986 dollars. [1] I often wonder about how having so many millionaire employees shaped company culture in the late 80's and through the 90's.

[1]: https://www.forbes.com/2010/06/28/microsoft-company-numbers-...

Re: Invisible unicorns: Big companies that started with little or no money

#40

I'm one of the authors of this post and plan on releasing an updated version with some companies that we missed on the first pass. If you know of other substantial startups that went far before raising capital, please let me know: JoeFlaherty@FounderCollective. The current list of misses includes: + Grammarly + 37 Signals/Basecamp + Zip Recruiter + Outcome Health + Wistia Who else?

i'm sure you've seen the interviews on indiehackers.com, but there are many more bootstrapped companies on their way up! many to watch out for.

For sure! IndieHackers is great and I hope to include many of those companies in the future. What we were trying to do was show that you could build big and substantial businesses. Too many people dismiss bootstrapping as a way to build lifestyle businesses when in fact it's a way to build public companies.

In some cases we featured some companies that had $10M+ revenues and extraordinary success in PR (Cards Against Humanity) or found some cool funding method (e.g. Kickstarter and CMON). LMK if there are any IndieHacker interviews you think deserve inclusion.

Thanks!

Post reply on HN