Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider eclipse. It allows the user to configure every. Single. Thing. And in doing so makes configuration difficult because there are so many options. Sane defaults and a consistent environment are better, imho.
Yeah. A great point. I do find eclipse to be too configurable, and part of why I use IntelliJ (for Java). Apple software is generally on the other end of that spectrum, which annoys many people; although you'll notice that even there you can put the bar on the left, right or bottom.
Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
31–40 of 51 posts
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#32This survey and the article show a remarkable amount of humility, which is something new to Ubuntu. I'm quite pleased to see this new direction for them.
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#33This survey and the article show a remarkable amount of humility, which is something new to Ubuntu. I'm quite pleased to see this new direction for them.
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider eclipse. It allows the user to configure every. Single. Thing. And in doing so makes configuration difficult because there are so many options. Sane defaults and a consistent environment are better, imho.
That's because Eclipse is basically an operating system like Emacs.
Emacs is nothing like Eclipse. If anything, I would compare Eclipse to Vim: bare bone its useless, with plug-ins its just too big and unstable.
:)
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would be very irritated if I couldn't put my bar on the left. I put it in the left on every UI I use. The reasoning seems sound though. Where there is no strong user preference, consider making it configurable. The only way you find out how irritated people would be without the option would be to piss them off.
Consider eclipse. It allows the user to configure every. Single. Thing. And in doing so makes configuration difficult because there are so many options. Sane defaults and a consistent environment are better, imho.
Those users who like the sane defaults can just stick with them. Those users who don't like those defaults can use the configuration options to fine-tune their experience.
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#36Users are split on whether window controls should be on the left or right. Hint: make it easily configurable. Otherwise, you get to irritate 40-60% of your users.
Also note the design of that pie chart - 'left' is on the right, and 'right' is on the left.
:)
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#37If your platform needs a bunch of extensions for CORE functionality, something is wrong.
Opinions on core functionality do vary rather a lot.
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#38I like using the keyboard as my main input for everything except scrolling. The more I can use the keyboard on a laptop, and the easier it is to know those hotkeys (holding down Meta key on Unity), the better.
If you haven't used Unity in a while, spin up a 17.04 VM to give it an hour or so of use. Makes you appreciate how far it's come.
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#39As a longtime Unity user, I hope they maintain the tiling-by-keyboard function of Unity in the new GNOME (or maybe it's a part of GNOME already). I like using the keyboard as my main input for everything except scrolling. The more I can use the keyboard on a laptop, and the easier it is to know those hotkeys (holding down Meta key on Unity), the better. If you haven't used Unity in a while, spin up a 17.04 VM to give…
At the moment you can only maximize to the left or right. Depending on the work done during GUADEC the quarter tiling functionality might be ready for GNOME 3.26. It actually already was available in one unstable version, then taken out in the next version.
I'm really looking forward to better support to divide your screen. With screens such as 2560x1440 it helps to have more options than just "two on one screen". Some people also use e.g. a huge (e.g. 40") 4K monitor. Then you'd want really good window management.
Re: Ubuntu Reveal Results of Gnome Desktop Survey
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider eclipse. It allows the user to configure every. Single. Thing. And in doing so makes configuration difficult because there are so many options. Sane defaults and a consistent environment are better, imho.
Sane defaults and extremely detailed configuration options can coexist. Those users who like the sane defaults can just stick with them. Those users who don't like those defaults can use the configuration options to fine-tune their experience.
IMO sane defaults and extremely detailed configuration go against each other. The detailed configuration makes it impossible to find the option you want.