>“It’s not about blocking ads, the web behaves as it always did, but your privacy is protected,” he added. Does this mean browser fingerprint is somehow scrambled before it is sent to the tracker instead of blocking?
> Does this mean browser fingerprint is somehow scrambled before it is sent to the tracker instead of blocking? It might be homogenized instead of scrambled. Every iOS device could be given (barring IP etc.) the same fingerprint.
Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
31–40 of 301 posts
Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are a number of ways. Cookies are one, but you can also collect other kinds of data from a web browser to uniquely identify a user across multiple sessions. Generally speaking, if you can run JavaScript, you can track the user. This is done by all advertisers and most little widgets like Facebook or Disqus comments, like and tweet buttons, etc.
> This is done by all advertisers and most little widgets like Facebook or Disqus comments, like and tweet buttons, etc. Why isn't this illegal already?
Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#33Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#34Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#35Later they demoed they can track your interests in what you've read on the web to show you personalized news on their news app and keyboard autocompletion.
They're also very careful to specify that this computation takes place locally on the device.
Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#36This is great, but unfortunately, until Apple ups its browser security game, Safari is a non-starter. On macOS, switching from any other browser to Chrome is in the top 3 things you can do to materially improve your security in ways that actually matter in the real world.
Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#37This is great, but unfortunately, until Apple ups its browser security game, Safari is a non-starter. On macOS, switching from any other browser to Chrome is in the top 3 things you can do to materially improve your security in ways that actually matter in the real world.
One specific area where Safari is better than Chrome is in private browsing mode. In Safari, each tab is completely separate, and the cookies aren't shared (as far as I can tell) whereas in Chrome, it's only separate as a whole "private browsing session." They each have their pros/cons but I prefer Safari's model.
Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#38This is great, but unfortunately, until Apple ups its browser security game, Safari is a non-starter. On macOS, switching from any other browser to Chrome is in the top 3 things you can do to materially improve your security in ways that actually matter in the real world.
Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#39Re: Apple adds a tracker blocker to desktop Safari
#40The big question to me is whether it's enabled by default, and whether it blocks requests to Google Analytics. If so, that's an interesting shot across the bow.