In Windows 7 they've finally given up and the UI lets you easily scroll up and down through months after clicking on the clock. (Edit: sorry I meant Windows 10)
Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
31–40 of 124 posts
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#32I worked on a visual programming language in late 80s. It would compile it's programs but the compiler was really slow, took minutes for small programs. We worked on optimizing it but couldn't find much to optimize. Then the founder took out the code that updated the progress bar as it compiled and compiles finished 10x faster. This was on Mac Plus.
I wonder if it was trashing the cache or something? What was so bad about this particular progress bar?
The 68k in the Plus is an 8MHz 32 bit processor with 16 bit data bus, 4 clock cycles per bus access if there are no wait states, and most instructions are more than one word long. There's not a whole lot of time to do useful work!
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#33On a more practical note, why would you want to have seconds on the clock? I find that most of the time I don't want to know the time to a precision of better than 5 minutes. That may just be me, but when someone asks the time and I read it off my phone as 3:56 it really bothers me and sometimes I convert that to 5-to-4 just to avoid what in most cases is arbitrary extra precision. Sure there are times when minutes c…
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#34I always have the seconds on (Ubuntu) and it's a good feature. I leave work every day at 17:28:15 sharp, otherwise I will miss my train (London DLR) and yes, seconds matter in this case.
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#35This is a good article, but keep in mind the timeframe it writes about. Not only was it 22 years ago, its writing about systems at the bare minimum system requirements. (Personally speaking, I remember speccing out a previous gen Windows 3.1 machine with 8MB of RAM in 92... and this is covering 4MB systems in 1995. By that time, 8-16MB would've been common.) Another story from the time is that I went to CompUSA (as a…
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
You must have really bad luck with Macs. As a MacOS user for seven years I can't say I've ever had that issue. Certainly not enough to need the seconds to be an indicator. I've had my system completely lock up maybe four times and those times my mouse refusing to move was enough of an indicator. Heck, right now it's been two and a half months since I've rebooted... and probably a year since I've rebooted because it f…
Do you use an external display? Mine crashes about once a week after I've unplugged it from the thunderbolt display
What mac do you use? Some of them have issues.
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#37It might not be the memory concern it once was, but today it might very well be a power concern. Modern laptop display pipelines can save power if they don't have to redraw any of the screen: constantly updating status bar animations break that.[1] 1: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2013/712/ (I think the relatively short graphics section mentions this. Can't seem to find the talk that goes into it in mor…
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#38Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#39Too bad the team which made that decision wasn't available to help the VS Code team not use 13% CPU to render a blinking cursor ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13940014 )
Re: Why doesn’t the clock in the taskbar display seconds? (2003)
#40If it's just for benchmarks, why not make it a preference (defaulted off), so benchmarks can be run with the default settings (off) just fine, but people can turn it on if they want to?
1) People with it on would say "Windows is slow". 2) Because it adds code to maintain that doesn't need to be.