Live data from Hacker News

TiddlyWiki: a local, single-page wiki

tiddlywiki.com

31–40 of 58 posts

Re: TiddlyWiki: a local, single-page wiki

#31
I am also a TiddlyWiki user. I use it as personal note taking + bookmarking + daily reading log. The best feature it has is a Wiki feature, not any TiddlyWiki feature: backlinks. I could make the backlinks show up in the footer of every page (tiddlers) and this reminds me connections I might have forgot. Tiddlywiki is also a great system for bookmarks. If I read something written by or about,say Roosevelt, I just add [[Roosevelt]] and I click on the link and just add a one line description like: Roosevelt was a [[US]] [[president|POTUS]] and it will create a nice connection to the POTUS page and the US page. This is different from restrictive categories.

I keep software links, configuration, track-list for stuff I want to track (great new product/bookmark/book/service, just add [[TrackList]] when creating that page and can see it later in the footer of my TrackList page. Most Wikis can do this, however, in TiddlyWiki it is easy—no need to edit PHP files or plugins; it has a nice filter syntax that allow anything to be queried in a myriad ways tags, date, custom fields, title and so on, I just place that filter right there in the text and get the results.

It also supports other syntaxs such as Org-mode and Markdown if you use them; in retrospect I should have chosen Org-mode as an Emacs user, it would have been easier to get the data to other programs.

Couple of problems I face:

+ No converter to convert files to other Wikis or formats:

Not a TW problem, Pandoc and other tools cannot convert this to say, MediaWiki or DokuWiki. So as a non-programmer I am stuck with this as of now. But I am slowly trying to make work a Perl module[x] to convert the HTML to wiki form.

+ Static pages has awful URLS:

It double encodes the URLs and it is filled with "%2520". I wish they make a setting to replace that with hyphens or underscores.example page:[y]

If they could get this to work I think this has the chance of being the best static site generator. Easy to use and extremely customisable (or may be I am coloured by my non-programmer experience with static site generators).

+ Duplicate titles:

'Notetaking' is different from 'notetaking', so occasionally, I link to a non-existing pages for less frequently linked pages; there should be a setting for naming policy.

+ Data corruption:

I've seen few cases where people lost their data completely. TW warns about this in their page and advice people to use backup (I backup it to Dropbox). Example:[z]

[x] http://search.cpan.org/~diberri/HTML-WikiConverter-0.61/lib/... [y] http://tiddlywiki.com/static/Introduction%2520to%2520filter%... [z] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/bgcRqKGQ2...

Community is friendly and helpful; I stole most of my customisation macros, code and notetaking ideas from the TiddlyWiki Google Group where helpful ideas and solutions are plenty. Nice bunch of people.

Re: TiddlyWiki: a local, single-page wiki

#32
I used TW as a research notebook for a while. The tagging + search worked pretty nicely for organization and the plugins for Latex were handy for adding math.

In fact you can just take a look here (might kill this link in a few days, fyi):

https://alexkrolick.github.io/research-notebook/index.html

EDIT: Here's a helpful "citation" macro for making notes on papers: https://alexkrolick.github.io/research-notebook/index.html#m...

Re: TiddlyWiki: a local, single-page wiki

#33
post #25
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "plugin" that you linked is for the older version of TiddlyWiki (it's called TiddlyWiki Classic now). There is a plugin for the modern TiddlyWiki (IIRC it's full name is TiddlyWiki5) called GSD5 (GSD is for "Getting Stuff Done"): http://gsd5.tiddlyspot.com/ . I've never used TW Classic and original mGSD, but GSD5 is "heavily inspired by mGSD" and on first glance they look alike a lot. And, anyway, TiddlyWiki5 wit…

Although responsive is nice, I find the update too stripped-down. I'm not a fan of the low-contrast (ios-style) movement in UX.. also it removes many links/buttons/features so that it looks more "simple". I'll take the ability to click on things in the original over the fancy transition effects.

TiddlyWiki is quiet flexible. I've rearranged a lot of stuff in my setup.

Re: TiddlyWiki: a local, single-page wiki

#34

I'm-gonna let tiddlywiki finish, but dokuwiki is greatest personal wiki of the tiny subset of internet users that use it.

I don't think so. My experiences with Dokuwiki is not great. Its WYSIWYG editor isn't integrated properly, switching back to Markup doesn't work without a page save, so a lot of useless clicks. Furthermore I wasn't convinced about Dokuwikis mobile interface, not even speaking of the inability to use the editor then.

Re: TiddlyWiki: a local, single-page wiki

#36
Wow, TiddlyWiki is still alive! I think I have a 10 year old thumb drive lying around with an early version on it. After cycling through Evernote, text files, and Google Keep, I'm eager to see what the TiddlyWiki experience is like. I'll be super impressed if I can import my 10 year old docs. (Though I'm not sure that would be useful...)
Post reply on HN