Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
31–40 of 180 posts
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#32Just the first ripples against the shore of what I expect to be a tsunami of unexpected consequences. Seems like a golden opportunity for another country to step up and become the "conference center of the world". I'd LOL extra hard if it turned out to be Mexico.
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot more people on the planet live near Beijing than near Iceland.
If you're talking about India and China, sure. If you're talking about America and Europe? Nope.
Then there's Vietnam, which is very poor but growing over 10% / year and highly educated despite the poverty. There are also hundreds of millions of people in Indonesia and Malaysia.
I was speaking not of the US or Europe but the world in general. We don't live in the Eurocentric world of 150 years ago. The center of gravity now spans the Pacific.
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Two reasons. First, flying to Canada is simply a longer flight. Second, the USA has some rules concerning passengers on flights in US airspace; it's possible that people who couldn't attend a conference in the USA wouldn't be allowed to fly over the USA either.
They mostly seem to have issues with flights that transit through the US, which you can avoid.
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're talking about India and China, sure. If you're talking about America and Europe? Nope.
Yes, India and China are indisputable giants but also consider Japan (still the #2 or #3 economy in the world depending on the metric), Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore—all advanced economies with extremely educated and technical populaces. Then there's Vietnam, which is very poor but growing over 10% / year and highly educated despite the poverty. There are also hundreds of millions of people in Indonesia and…
Also this entire argument is utterly absurd. If you're upset about brutal domestic policies the last place you should be arguing in favor of is China.
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
They mostly seem to have issues with flights that transit through the US, which you can avoid.
But the TSA requires airlines to list all passengers on flights travelling over US airspace, and can instruct an airline not to allow specific passengers onto that flight (or, presumably, not allow that airline to fly over its airspace).
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#37Just the first ripples against the shore of what I expect to be a tsunami of unexpected consequences. Seems like a golden opportunity for another country to step up and become the "conference center of the world". I'd LOL extra hard if it turned out to be Mexico.
Seems like a golden opportunity for another country to step up and become the "conference center of the world". I'd LOL extra hard if it turned out to be Mexico. Can I suggest Canada for this purpose? We're a cheaper conference destination than the USA, Europe, or Japan; have a fluently English-speaking population anywhere conferences would be held (most people in Montreal are bilingual); have good infrastructure; an…
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#38Innovation thrives on freedom. Freedom of expression, freedom of movement, freedom of markets. And tech, in its best form, is about freedom, rather than market-capture and rent-seeking. Needless to say, none of these recent developments are good.
Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#39Re: Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
They mostly seem to have issues with flights that transit through the US, which you can avoid.
But the TSA requires airlines to list all passengers on flights travelling over US airspace, and can instruct an airline not to allow specific passengers onto that flight (or, presumably, not allow that airline to fly over its airspace).