This is incorrect on several points. Scaphold supports relay and Apollo out of the box and integrates with auth0 (per their docs; I've used neither feature).
Subjectively, having played with both, I chose scaphold (over graph.cool and reindex) for a few reasons:
- pricing model makes a lot more sense to me. Graph.cool tiers their pricing on user counts, which makes very little sense to me for a product the cost drivers of which are storage and throughput. They also apparently count a user once they register, with no clear way of handling inactive users (can't be good for your LTV calcs). Reindex was also suboptimal imo, with steep jumps from free tier to paid. They also charge based on 'operations,' which, while less so, also seems strangely divorced from what I imagine their cost drivers are. Scaphold seems to have taken firebase's pricing model, which was a smart move
- storage. Graph.cool has really low storage per tier. Reindex bills storage separately from 'operations' and only charges in $50 5GB chunks (5.1 GB last month? Sorry!). Scaphold again copies firebase's pricing with small, inexpensive increments.
- ui. I didn't use graph.cool's ui too much, but I'm very happy with scaphold's. Afaik reminded didn't have any ui to speak of--someone correct me here if I'm wrong. You can build your entire schema in scaphold's ui (with very helpful tool tips most of the time) , manage integrations (which, generally, just make certain queries/mutations available), and view some pretty thorough analytics on your app. Coming from firebase, which has been really neglecting web app users in favor of mobile lately (imo), this was really nice.
Lastly, I'm new to graphql, but as I understand it, scaphold has added some nice features on top of the API. It seems to mirror PostgraphQL (a postgres graphql utility), and adds pretty robust support for relationships (1:1,1:many,many:many). My schema is highly relational and, so far, it's a breeze.
I will note that graph.cool seems to have much more newbie-friendly docs, and maybe more comprehensive docs over all. Scaphold's docs are okay: they're wider than they are deep (maybe a paragraph for every feature w/ an uncommented snippet), there are some obvious mistakes, and some parts of the docs are scattered between the docs page and the UI's tool tips. When I had problems, though, their team got back to me w/in minutes (on email and slack).
To be clear, I'm not affiliated w/ any company discussed here--I'm just a user shopping for a firebase replacement.
That said, if you're considering the product, here's a ref link--$10 for you & $25 for me https://scaphold.io/referral?ref=99XXP3