Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
31–40 of 76 posts
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#32And it begins. The birth of a company with a direct conflict of interest in making Kubernetes so simple to use/administer that you don't need to pay another company for 'enterprise support'. This happens quite frequently with open source infrastructure. Keep an eye on them to push back against improvements that directly conflict with their company's "enterprise sauce".
Kubernetes will help reduce the number of engineers needed to maintain large systems. This is the beginning of the end for the DevOps engineering career - There will still be DevOps jobs left but they won't pay as much.
That is, me with eventually a junior that I'm getting up to speed so he can take my place.
Furthermore, the "run" part is only a fraction of the job, the whole pilgrimage from developers' code to a production-ready container is most of the work, and that's very client-specific.
For example, I will always have a high-paying job at making workflows that help ensuring average developers cannot send bad code in production, that they are reviewed etc.
Kubernetes is great because the "run" part was really the low-hanging fruit. A container is a container, and setting up routing, provisioning etc is very generic and boring.
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#33I don't use k8s, so forgive my ignorance, but what are the use cases in "the enterprise"? How many "enterprises" need to manage 1K microservice containers to approve weekly timesheets? Is this just a play for companies that want to run their products/services on private cloud?
Just one simple example of many: think of all the software services that Tesla needs to do the fancy stuff that they are doing.
There are many car companies right now trying to catch up, building scalable and resilient services, doing analytics, navigation, M2M stuff, emergency services, car rental, lots of stuff.
Weekly timesheets of course is definitely not the use case for this.
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#34How many founders does k8s? I thought it was Brendan Burns
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#35And it begins. The birth of a company with a direct conflict of interest in making Kubernetes so simple to use/administer that you don't need to pay another company for 'enterprise support'. This happens quite frequently with open source infrastructure. Keep an eye on them to push back against improvements that directly conflict with their company's "enterprise sauce".
When integrating something like Kubernetes with existing systems and processes there will always be opportunity for additional systems and support that aren't easily built in the open. Often times these aren't fun things and so are harder to get critical mass in the open.
The first part of our plan is to help fill usability gaps for Kubernetes in the open. This will grow the pie and expand our standing in the community.
Commercially we will filling gaps unique to large companies around integration with existing systems and managing ops and dev relationships. Specifics here will have to wait until product is ready.
In general we have a value around "Honest Technology". We want to build products that just work and do what it says on the tin.
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#36I mapped out the influencer networks for Docker and Kubernetes using the tool Little Bird - you can see here[1] that the Kubernetes network is not dominated by any one subgroup: it's not an ecosystem dominated by anybody (except Google, and not in the same way as most OSS which come out of companies). So don't worry about Heptio in that way -- if anything worry that too many companies are all trying to fix the same p…
You're also welcome to look at the kubernetes stats here: https://cncf.biterg.io You can clearly see the diverse number of contributors/companies
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that this is just some people who helped start the project when they were at Google, and both of them have since left. Kubernetes is managed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, and a very large number of companies are involved in managing the project's direction with an open governance model. There are diverse enough interests already that there isn't really any risk of one company's interests driving the…
Like OpenStack?
It is a funny you say this. I spent a lot of time looking around the community at what existed before starting CNCF, and agonized over this. We needed to take K8s to foundation so that it wouldn't be a 'Google project'. Google was actually the best steward of the tech you could imagine, because the plan was always to make k8s ubiquitous and just win on quality of infrastructure but the community had no way to know that.
I looked at OpenStack hard, and like the energy and enthusiasm but really worried about (1) balkanization that was emerging with no 'true north' -- it just didn't have technical taste, (2) the tragedy of the commons -- most vendors were focused on their own interests and neglected the end users, (3) lack of coherence.
When designing CNCF I tried hard to work through this by creating a better foundation structure. (1) the business board has very limited authority over projects, hopefully making sure that we avoid it being a pay-for-play affair. (2) we made provisions for little companies to get top level seats based on community contributions (ditto) (3) we created an empowered end user group that would have equal authority to any other affair to make sure real users interest are promoted (4) we added a TOC (technical oversight committee) that was the most empowered group to establish true north that is community elected -- the idea is they need to champion the projects and establish technical 'taste' (e.g. Brian Grant from Google -- the guy who drives consistency sat on this group, not me the guy who had access to the purse strings and who was focused on the business).
(side note: i picked this structure because i was geeking on government structures at the time, and figured that the separation of powers yields more sustainable administration)
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#38Bad name. The first thing that sprang to my mind was hepatitis...
I would describe this as a case of 'domain based naming' (i.e. we could get the domain name, it was uncontested space).
I hope to create something positive out of it, if we do it up right hopefully the company character will dominate the name.
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#39How many founders does k8s? I thought it was Brendan Burns
It was me, Brendan and Craig McLuckie.
To raise awareness of Docker in Google, I asked Brendan to pull together a demo for our all hands. In a nutshell what he produced was the bones of Kubernetes. I remember looking at it and having a moment, he had built a mini borg cell on VMs. Basically made borg a devops accessible tool, not just a monolithic clustering tool (like Mesos was). When I saw that the product ramifications were obvious, I called Joe over to look and the rest is history.
Re: Kubernetes Founders Launched Startup Heptio to Bring Containers to Enterprise
#40And it begins. The birth of a company with a direct conflict of interest in making Kubernetes so simple to use/administer that you don't need to pay another company for 'enterprise support'. This happens quite frequently with open source infrastructure. Keep an eye on them to push back against improvements that directly conflict with their company's "enterprise sauce".
Note that this is just some people who helped start the project when they were at Google, and both of them have since left. Kubernetes is managed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, and a very large number of companies are involved in managing the project's direction with an open governance model. There are diverse enough interests already that there isn't really any risk of one company's interests driving the…