I don't see anything about the rights of video owners? Have people (inadvertently) licensed their content to be used in this way?
I'd guess the reasoning is, because it's a list of public URLs, there's no expectation of privacy.
31–39 of 39 posts
I don't see anything about the rights of video owners? Have people (inadvertently) licensed their content to be used in this way?
I'd guess the reasoning is, because it's a list of public URLs, there's no expectation of privacy.
I don't see anything about the rights of video owners? Have people (inadvertently) licensed their content to be used in this way?
I wish they'd addressed that too. I'd guess the reasoning is, because it's a list of public URLs, there's no expectation of privacy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reproducing the intelligence of an insect is incredibly more difficult than following a list of rules for a board game. Like I said, the A.I we have today cannot even simulate the brain of a cockroach. In fact we don't even fully understand their brains, how they work and whether or not they even have consciousness. When we do figure it out perhaps we can start building real A.I systems, but until then programs beati…
That's just the same old phenomenon that as soon as AI does something outstanding, people redefine the meaning of intelligence to exclude it. I'd say that in many of these cases, people expect "true" intelligence to come with conscience. But when some AI passes any test for consciousness you can throw at it, I'm sure there'll be people saying "it's not consciousness, it's just (perfectly) simulation consciousness". S…
This is why it's always amusing to me whenever people call Google the future Skynet or try to enact laws for AI. We're so far away from real AI that I have my doubts we'll even get there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reproducing the intelligence of an insect is incredibly more difficult than following a list of rules for a board game. Like I said, the A.I we have today cannot even simulate the brain of a cockroach. In fact we don't even fully understand their brains, how they work and whether or not they even have consciousness. When we do figure it out perhaps we can start building real A.I systems, but until then programs beati…
If you think that's how AlphaGo works, you should maybe take a closer look.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds interesting, do you guys have a blog at mashtime? What kind of hardware/software do you use for training? Tensorflow? on AWS or bare metal GPUs?
We don't have a blog yet. We're using Azure for the hardware and mainly scikit-learn for the training (we train only on metadata at the moment). Will probably start using Tensorflow soon.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> There's nothing intelligent about AlphaGo. Classic Shit HN Says material. Never change, HN. Never change.
Perhaps you'd like to prove the intelligence exhibited by AlphaGo.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We don't have a blog yet. We're using Azure for the hardware and mainly scikit-learn for the training (we train only on metadata at the moment). Will probably start using Tensorflow soon.
Would you say Tensorflow is a good way to get started with Machine learning?