Live data from Hacker News

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral

techcrunch.com

31–40 of 560 posts

Re: A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral

#31

I am surprised that no one has mentioned whether or not this failure is related to SpaceX's first time reusing a rocket. If so, hopefully this isn't too much of a setback!

The reused rocket will be used to launch SES-10 later this year, not AMOS-6.

Source: http://spacenews.com/spacex-to-launch-ses-10-satellite-on-re...

Re: A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral

#36

You can see the smoke plume on the radar image from Melbourne airport weather radar http://imgur.com/a/FQ4qx Live link: http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=mlb

We sure that's a smoke plume? There's a lot of radar activity over Florida presently due to the "OMG first hurricane in 11 years!!!"[0]

[0] I live in and am in the Big Bend area, so the news, tweets, emails, and texts about the storm are a bit ... much.

Re: A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral

#37
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Test fire for the launch of a commercial satellite (AMOS-6), which had been scheduled for a few days hence (and now presumably delayed, along with the rest of their launch schedule, pending further investigation). It might conceivably have been during fueling/de-fueling around the test. It's not yet clear from public reports whether the payload was attached at the time of the test-fire; sometimes they are, sometimes…

So does that put the rocket in a situation where its either launch or warm up and explode? I'm adventurous, but I don't want to be strapped to that thing if thats the case.

I'm sure it's not like that. Pressure relief valves aren't exactly rocket science.

Re: A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral

#39
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Test fire for the launch of a commercial satellite (AMOS-6), which had been scheduled for a few days hence (and now presumably delayed, along with the rest of their launch schedule, pending further investigation). It might conceivably have been during fueling/de-fueling around the test. It's not yet clear from public reports whether the payload was attached at the time of the test-fire; sometimes they are, sometimes…

So does that put the rocket in a situation where its either launch or warm up and explode? I'm adventurous, but I don't want to be strapped to that thing if thats the case.

It means that if there's a launch failure, you can't just let the stuff sit there. They clearly can pump it out -- the normal sequence for this sort of test (which SpaceX generally does before every launch) involves filling the tanks and then running the engines for only a second or two, and they also obviously need procedures for last-minute launch scrubs, which can happen for a whole bunch of reasons. (One launch was recently delayed because someone steered their boat into the no-go area.)

The main operational consequence to date has been to limit the number of times that they can try to launch within an extended launch window. But if something goes wrong with the fuel-handling equipment, or thermal management inside the tanks, things can get bad.

Re: A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket has exploded at Cape Canaveral

#40
post #27

"This rocket was scheduled to launch the Amos-6 communication satellite, which among other functions included the capabilities for Facebook to spot-beam broadband for Facebook’s Internet.org initiative" Bad karma

No payload on rocket while hotfire test.
Post reply on HN