Drool – A Lightweight Markup Language

Post by dou4cc » Fri, Sep 02, 2016, 11:54 AM UTC

jonathanyc wrote: post #28

dou4cc wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At most 1 year later, firefox will support drool. Firefox does not support drool because it does not support async generator function.

There is no such thing as an "async generator function" in the JavaScript language :) Do you mean generator functions, which Edge and Firefox both support? Or async/await? I think people are upset because normally when someone shows a project on HN, you expect to be able to run it. It's cool that this is something you have made to test new features, but if you haven't put in the marginal effort to make it usable for…

    (async function*(){})

Post by SamBam » Fri, Sep 02, 2016, 1:23 PM UTC

dou4cc wrote: post #22

SamBam wrote: post #7

> Compared with markdown, drool is minimal without signals like [ or !. drool will not make a literary article look like programming codes. looks at demo screenshot > There is @@a link to @@./demo.webp https://www.google.com/ncr

The link content is "a link to @@./demo.webp". "@@./demo.webp" is a picture. Is drool not minimal enough?