Why the hell aren't these chuckleheads on Bloomberg where they belong?
Not using a free IM service like Yahoo's seems like a fiduciary sin.
31–40 of 111 posts
Why the hell aren't these chuckleheads on Bloomberg where they belong?
Not using a free IM service like Yahoo's seems like a fiduciary sin.
Why didn't Yahoo focus on further developing businesses around these services (Finance, Fantasy etc.) that people love?
How do you monetize that? But they were adamant that they were a 'media company', so your point is very valid.
The oil traders could move to WhatsApp or somesuch but I'd be kind of sad if they went. The other day I was trying to get free historical stock data via an API and Yahoo Finance was about the only thing that did it ok. Yahoo could assure their financial future by going massively long oil futures and then putting out false messages about Saudi Arabia having been nuked by ISIS or some such. A tad illegal perhaps but an…
When an industry is so reliant on one service, it's very difficult to shift an entire industry to a new platform. Segmentation is a real thing. A good example I'm familiar with is within electronic sports (competitive video-games): almost every executive, player, personality, etc has been using Skype since ~2010. Unfortunately, Skype has a large number of security vulnerabilities and users can be subjected by DDOS at…
Besides, many superior solutions exist and have for a long time: TeamSpeak, Ventrilo, Mumble. Skype is laggy, buggy, and high memory overhead, without mentioning the DDOS risk (exposes IP).
Why the hell aren't these chuckleheads on Bloomberg where they belong?
Hard to see a harbormaster with a Bloomberg terminal.
This is insane. Why does guy who digs a hole and sell's oil need to care about high tech?!
This article seems ridiculous both because Yahoo messenger isn't going anywhere. And if it did, moving to another service would be a small hiccup.
I work in physical trading and use yahoo on a daily basis to trade swaps, execute physical deals, and chat with customers. If yahoo were to drop support unexpectedly, there would be a pretty large problem.
We have already been briefed by our IT departments that we are moving to another service with the front end being one of the following - IceChat(from the ICE exchange), Reuters, Bloomberg, Trillian. Although Yahoo will be the back-end in protocol sense, I believe that will be phased out once the trade migrates to another service.
It's a bigger problem than most imagine and can't be executed at a drop of a hat due to legal compliance in logging all communications in the case something went awry or other similar situations.
Sounds like an opportunity for someone to buy yahoo messenger, make it work the way the oil industry wants it, and sell it to them as an industry specific chat service. No need to bring the rest of Yahoo along for the ride.
Definitely the best way to ease the transition between chat services.
FWIW, nat gas traders still use Aol Instant Messenger.
> In Geneva, the epicenter of Switzerland’s $21 billion commodity-trading industry, accounting for about one-third of the world’s daily oil transactions That's pretty impressive for a country that has never even been visited by an oil tanker.
The commodity trade in Switzerland is as old as the hills.