Live data from Hacker News

Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

spectrum.ieee.org

31–40 of 85 posts

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#31
I spent a few days in the DAO chat room discussing a potential proposal.

The general consensus among the developers was that the DAO isn't ready for a real business, and any business owner intending to use the DAO would face real potential risks for loss of funds or worse.

Still, it's a really interesting idea. Wish it was ready for prime-time.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#32
post #27

What advantages does the DAO offer over a regular fund for investors? It looks like you get less regulartion and legal weight if things go wrong...am I missing something?

Its transparent and everyone can vote. So its like being able to read over all contracts and investment strategies that a fund manager is considering ahead of time and voting whether you want to be part of it. Then you can see every single transaction the 'fund manager' makes.

If you understand how Wall St. works then the question becomes 'why does anyone use regular funds'.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#33
post #31

I spent a few days in the DAO chat room discussing a potential proposal. The general consensus among the developers was that the DAO isn't ready for a real business, and any business owner intending to use the DAO would face real potential risks for loss of funds or worse. Still, it's a really interesting idea. Wish it was ready for prime-time.

That's just the difference between honest problem solving people and the average Wall St. sales guy. One tells you about the risks, the other doesn't really understand the risks or care, he is just trying to get more of your money to play with.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#34

I read the article as saying "passive investors might get screwed". So this discussion should be healthy for the DAO if it gets these passive folks to become more active. Creating the future will require some work.

No, it's worse than that. Everyone (with money in the DAO) may be screwed.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#35
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In a way, this is like Uber or Airbnb, you can't ask permission or you'd be out of business before you managed to change the laws. Asking forgiveness is not only easier than asking permission, sometimes it's the only viable route. They may lose money, they may make some. But it's a grand experiment of a kind that's never been tried before and I'm curious to see the results.

> you can't ask permission or you'd be out of business before you managed to change the laws. That strategy didn't work out too well for Zenefits.

But it has worked out for others. Risks are still risks.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#36

Discussion around the issues outlined in the report have already begun (before the report was published) in the DAO forums. It's not unexpected that there will be problems. This has never been done before. But the fact that this report exists, the problems are being discussed, and there are already talks of proposals for resolving some of the issues is a good sign that the DAO is working as intended... The community…

The "investors" risk losing all their money, and the curators and contractors risk going to prison because they are conducting an illegal securities offering with no valid exemption.

All investments carry risk. Thankfully, permissionless innovation platforms don't care what governments think. If it turns out that governments do try to ban DAOs, we'll just need to enhance their privacy.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#37
post #32
post #27

What advantages does the DAO offer over a regular fund for investors? It looks like you get less regulartion and legal weight if things go wrong...am I missing something?

Its transparent and everyone can vote. So its like being able to read over all contracts and investment strategies that a fund manager is considering ahead of time and voting whether you want to be part of it. Then you can see every single transaction the 'fund manager' makes. If you understand how Wall St. works then the question becomes 'why does anyone use regular funds'.

People use regular funds because they want their capital to grow without having to think or work.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#38
The no vote bias looks like a serious flaw in the DAO. As the authors say, it is safe for an informed investor to split than to vote "no" on a proposal (for reference, users who split are still entitled to the proceeds of any proposal they funded so far). So passive investors would either be in danger of an attack from a bad proposal, or would find a way to automatically split if the investor wasn't available, defeating the purpose of the DAO.

Put another way, the stock market rewards passive investors with exactly the same rewards as active investors (which has its own problems - shareholder control over management is notoriously lax), but the DAO goes to the opposite extreme.

I personally think that calling for a moratorium is presumptuous - I'm certainly glad there was no moratorium of the stock market when it was introduced because some economists identified some real flaws. But it is a well researched critique.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It removes all autonomy from the voter being able to express their true preferences as the author has subjugated them to profit.

You are missing the point - whether their motivation is purely profit, or altruistic, or whatever - if they do not want to fund a project, they have an incentive not to vote 'No' against it because as soon as they do they can no longer remove their money from the DAO, and have committed to funding the project if it passes.

Maybe you are missing the point?

The author conflates an (presumably autonomous) individual's true preference with necessarily increasing the net worth of the DAO. There is no a priori reason to believe that.

Edit: you could, like, you know, post a reason to believe the equivalency.

Re: Ethereum’s $150M DAO Opens as Researchers Call for a Halt

#40
https://boards.4chan.org/biz/thread/1271161/wtf

Transcript: http://pastebin.com/raw/ATJSADgr

One could argue that the thread consists of nothing but trolling, and that no one could possibly be so stupid as to invest their entire life savings, take out loans, and attempt to use credit cards to buy coins. Unfortunately, I've seen it happen.

The conversations on that thread are almost exactly the same as they were several years ago. "Hold. Things will get better, you simply must hold." "But I lost half my life savings..."

Post reply on HN