The English language seems to be missing some word that other languages have. In Dutch, "goochelen", performed by a "goochelaar" is doing tricks in a show, where you know it's all illusions but it's still very impressive. On the other hand, "toveren", done by a "tovenaar" would be doing something supernatural. Typically a "goochelaar" is somebody on a stage with a black top hat, while a "tovenaar" is more like an old…
Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
31–40 of 44 posts
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#32Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#33It makes more sense once you realize they're talking about bunny-in-hat magic and not magic magic.
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#34Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#35The English language seems to be missing some word that other languages have. In Dutch, "goochelen", performed by a "goochelaar" is doing tricks in a show, where you know it's all illusions but it's still very impressive. On the other hand, "toveren", done by a "tovenaar" would be doing something supernatural. Typically a "goochelaar" is somebody on a stage with a black top hat, while a "tovenaar" is more like an old…
In American English, a 'magician' is somebody who pulls rabbits out of hats, and a 'wizard' is somebody who does supernatural things. We don't have as good of a separation for goochelen/toveren, but most Americans would use 'magic tricks' for goochelen and just 'magic' for toveren.
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#36It's nice to see that lobbying isn't just for large corporations, but vegas showmen can milk this ridiculous, broken system too. /s
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#37The English language seems to be missing some word that other languages have. In Dutch, "goochelen", performed by a "goochelaar" is doing tricks in a show, where you know it's all illusions but it's still very impressive. On the other hand, "toveren", done by a "tovenaar" would be doing something supernatural. Typically a "goochelaar" is somebody on a stage with a black top hat, while a "tovenaar" is more like an old…
On the other hand though "magician" unambiguously refers to a person that performs stage magic, in a modern context at least.
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#38The English language seems to be missing some word that other languages have. In Dutch, "goochelen", performed by a "goochelaar" is doing tricks in a show, where you know it's all illusions but it's still very impressive. On the other hand, "toveren", done by a "tovenaar" would be doing something supernatural. Typically a "goochelaar" is somebody on a stage with a black top hat, while a "tovenaar" is more like an old…
We do, it's prestidigitation but no one really uses it.
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because of a strong lobby, especially from David Copperfield. As usual, just follow the money.
Reads like an advertisement for Copperfield. But in terms of advancing the art form and of classic prestidigitation, I can think of no better current practitioner than Ricky Jay.
Re: Recognizing magic as a rare and valuable art form and national treasure
#40The English language seems to be missing some word that other languages have. In Dutch, "goochelen", performed by a "goochelaar" is doing tricks in a show, where you know it's all illusions but it's still very impressive. On the other hand, "toveren", done by a "tovenaar" would be doing something supernatural. Typically a "goochelaar" is somebody on a stage with a black top hat, while a "tovenaar" is more like an old…
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Thurston...