A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
31–40 of 41 posts
Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I received the same stat.
Same here. It's probably a hard coded message. You'd think the hacker news post would skew it a bit if it was realtime. Either that or they have a really massive data set on it that's hard to skew.
[1] (spoiler alert, do not read the slug of this URL) https://engineering.linkedin.com/content/dam/static-sites/en...
Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#33Usually crossword answers make sense. This ended up just looking like a jumble of letters.
The jumble of letters made sense in the context of the regex problems.
Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#34Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#35LinkedIn thought, "We have a problem, not enough good devs." Then they thought, "Hey, let's recruit using a regex puzzle!" Now they have two problems. (With apologies to jwz.)
I'd even argue that LinkedIn doesn't really even need amazing developers. As far as code goes, they're only really solving problems that have been solved for decades. Infrastructure is another matter, but I doubt they're doing anything insane on that front either.
Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#36To up the ante, it would be a fairly good challenge to write a computer program that solves this puzzle efficiently.
I think that's what distinguishes the truly excellent/"lazy" coders from the head-down, 9-to-5 types.
Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#37If you enjoyed that, there's plenty more where that came from at https://regexcrossword.com/
So, thanks, and also no thanks ;)
Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#38Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#39Re: A regex crossword from LinkedIn Engineering
#40Solved this puzzle last time and LinkedIn basically told me "we won't actually interview you unless you have 2-4 years of industry experience" new grads be warned.
Some people had to work whatever job(s) they could find or had family issues to deal with and go to school at the same time. Are they less qualified because of it?