31–40 of 99 posts
I wonder if this could be the beginning of many artists being replaced by AI.
I wonder if this could be the beginning of many artists being replaced by AI.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And now at http://deepart.io/ we have hi-resolution and the authors of the algorithm on-board. Thanks for mentioning us :)
You should add an explanation for the waiting time, queue thing. This was unexpected and also not really clear. First thought I could only get it by paying...
We simply have limited resources for servers, but still want to provide the highest quality possible in the free version. That's why there is a queue, but we are working hard to make the implementation faster and more efficient :)
I wonder if this could be the beginning of many artists being replaced by AI.
I wonder if this could be the beginning of many artists being replaced by AI.
From my understanding it seems that the technology exists to replicate human art, not to create new styles on top of it. So I think in order to train the technology to do more styles of art it will require humans to make those new styles.
In the meantime, there are tons of underground movements and scenes, coming up with new sounds and styles, and the artists we generally accept as proper such (and not just performers), belong to these, feeding new styles into the mainstream.
Something similar will probably hold true for computer-made "art": Some very nice and enjoyable things will come out of it (and tons and tons of trivial and dull things as well), but the truly interesting stuff is made by humans further up the funnel.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should add an explanation for the waiting time, queue thing. This was unexpected and also not really clear. First thought I could only get it by paying...
Good point, thanks! We actually had one, but we removed it in the current version (it seemed natural for us but it obviously is not) - we will bring it back. We simply have limited resources for servers, but still want to provide the highest quality possible in the free version. That's why there is a queue, but we are working hard to make the implementation faster and more efficient :)
The success message (when there will be one - there should be one instead of only the submissions queue) should definitely include an explanation, what happens next and how I can influence it. Will I get an email when my pictures are ready? Can I schedule more pictures?
I think you will have more success showing the # of people in the queue and a "jump the queue" feature.
Is there a way to build a "I want it NOW, even if it isn't that great... (and get the great version later via email)".
The public/private thing could also use some explanation "Show this on the website" vs. "Only give the result to me".
"Delete" would probably better be named "remove" as you remove the submission from the queue, and don't really delete anything that was already created.
Also, "Submit a new image" could let me choose some style images... but I bet that's already on your backlog anyway.
Nice idea, nice tool!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should add an explanation for the waiting time, queue thing. This was unexpected and also not really clear. First thought I could only get it by paying...
Good point, thanks! We actually had one, but we removed it in the current version (it seemed natural for us but it obviously is not) - we will bring it back. We simply have limited resources for servers, but still want to provide the highest quality possible in the free version. That's why there is a queue, but we are working hard to make the implementation faster and more efficient :)
Unfortunately "I want it now" is not possible for the moment as the computations are really heavy and there is a lot of people who want to use it. But we also have some ideas for that.
Now our focus is the quality, regardless the cost. We increased the resolution and we try to make things faster. Later we will figure out how to make it more sustainable.
I really appreciate your suggestions.