Live data from Hacker News

Introducing OpenAI

openai.com

31–40 of 392 posts

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#31

I can't think of another field of research that's simultaneously brought the potential to solve all the world's problems and the potential to end life as we know it. Very appreciative to see so many great minds working on ensuring AI heralds in more of the former, and none of the latter.

They said this 60 years when AI began.

And?

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#32
post #3

This is about 100 years too early. Seriously why do people think neural networks are the answer to AI? They are proven to be stupid outside of their training data. We have such a long way to go. This fear-mongering is pointless.

Humans are really stupid without training too.

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#33
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I seem to have missed a story here. A quick Google search turned up a letter on Quora, https://www.quora.com/Is-working-in-Infosys-as-bad-as-this-l... , is that what you are refering too?

YC is lobbying to change the H-1B system in order the let startups get more H-1Bs. Infosys is blatantly abusing and cheating the H-1B system so bad that startups are getting penalized when sponsoring H-1B visas. And now YC is getting in bed with infosys...

Aw okay, I read about the Visa gaming in the NYTimes. Seems shitty. Thanks for the answer!

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#34
post #20
post #3

This is about 100 years too early. Seriously why do people think neural networks are the answer to AI? They are proven to be stupid outside of their training data. We have such a long way to go. This fear-mongering is pointless.

I don't see any "fear-mongering" in this announcement?

The creation of what is essentially an ethics committee for a technology that doesn't even exist yet? With people such as Elon Musk on board who have publicly said 'AI is our biggest existential threat' ?

Additionally the second paragraph:

We believe AI should be an extension of individual human wills and, in the spirit of liberty, as broadly and evenly distributed as is possible safely.

This infers they think AI will be used for hostile means. Such as wiping out the human race maybe? It is just un-informed people making un-informed decisions and then informing other un-informed people of said decisions as if they were informed.

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#36

$1B in committed funding. Just, wow. Side note: I wonder if the Strong AI argument can benefit from something akin to Pascal's Wager, in that the upside of being right is ~infinite with only a finite downside in the opposing case.

Finite downside? What about Skynet?

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#37

In all seriousness... does "just, wow" communicate something different from "wow?"

It implies that you were about to exclaim something even more extreme than "wow", but you decided not to because even those terms wouldn't properly convey the amazement you feel so you said - just - wow.

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#38
"We believe AI should be an extension of individual human wills..."

I realize that today machine learning really is purely a tool, but the idea that ai will and should always be that doesn't sit quite right with me. Ml tech absent of consciousnesses remains a tool and an incredibly useful one, but in the long term you have to ask the question - at what point does an ai transition from a tool to a slave. Seems some time off still but I do wish we'd give it more serious thought before it arrives.

Re: Introducing OpenAI

#40

"We believe AI should be an extension of individual human wills..." I realize that today machine learning really is purely a tool, but the idea that ai will and should always be that doesn't sit quite right with me. Ml tech absent of consciousnesses remains a tool and an incredibly useful one, but in the long term you have to ask the question - at what point does an ai transition from a tool to a slave. Seems some ti…

We've been pretty happy to enslave animals in semi-symbiotic relationships for thousands of years. It's about the same as that.
Post reply on HN