Live data from Hacker News

Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

bloomberg.com

31–40 of 89 posts

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#31

Wow all the comments here seem negative. The guy is just saying that people should be clearer with their writing and getting to the point right away to avoid confusion. If they're writing about a topic that's more complex, sure, the writing will need to be more complex. But there's nothing wrong with communicating simply if the subject allows it.

Whether your topic is simple or complex, you still need to lead with your point. A complex analysis might have many sub-points that you prove-up in subsequent paragraphs, but your ultimate conclusion still needs to come at the beginning, and each supporting paragraph still needs to lead with the sub-point you're proving.

Say you're writing a memo to your boss explaining why you need to double the size of your engineering team. That point has to come first. Now, maybe the reason you need to double the size of your engineering team is that management wants to add new product lines, and customers are demanding more customized solutions. Okay, so each of those points are the leads in their own paragraphs.

Where a lot of people have problems is that their writing is a chronological recounting of their thinking about the issue. So it starts somewhere in the middle where they encountered some part of the overall issue, then backs up to where they recognize the larger issue, and then buries the solution at the end.

The structure you were taught in high-school: topic sentence, supporting sentences, conclusion, is simple and appropriate for business communications. There are some writers who can clearly convey complicated thoughts using a more narrative structure, but you'll rarely go astray sticking to that basic style.

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#32
The summary first style of writing is a hack to enable quick trust establishment. It doesn't work for all concepts and it's unlikely to be effective for communicating very complex and innovative subjects.

Also, some things just have to be shown visually to be trusted. A paragraph explaining an anti-gravity device isn't going to cut it. You need to show it working in person where there can be no doubt it's doing what you say it does.

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#34
post #31

Wow all the comments here seem negative. The guy is just saying that people should be clearer with their writing and getting to the point right away to avoid confusion. If they're writing about a topic that's more complex, sure, the writing will need to be more complex. But there's nothing wrong with communicating simply if the subject allows it.

Whether your topic is simple or complex, you still need to lead with your point. A complex analysis might have many sub-points that you prove-up in subsequent paragraphs, but your ultimate conclusion still needs to come at the beginning, and each supporting paragraph still needs to lead with the sub-point you're proving. Say you're writing a memo to your boss explaining why you need to double the size of your enginee…

tl;dr

Complex or simple, lead with point. Because reasons.

Intro, support, conclusion -- do it.

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#35

The summary first style of writing is a hack to enable quick trust establishment. It doesn't work for all concepts and it's unlikely to be effective for communicating very complex and innovative subjects. Also, some things just have to be shown visually to be trusted. A paragraph explaining an anti-gravity device isn't going to cut it. You need to show it working in person where there can be no doubt it's doing what…

There is no subject so complex and innovative that you can't start with a summary explaining what the point is and why readers should care.

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#36

Read your writing out loud to yourself, carefully observing the punctuation. You won't become Hemingway, but you will find the most obvious flaws in your writing.

I like to paste things into this as well...

http://www.hemingwayapp.com/

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#38

The summary first style of writing is a hack to enable quick trust establishment. It doesn't work for all concepts and it's unlikely to be effective for communicating very complex and innovative subjects. Also, some things just have to be shown visually to be trusted. A paragraph explaining an anti-gravity device isn't going to cut it. You need to show it working in person where there can be no doubt it's doing what…

> The summary first style of writing is a hack to enable quick trust establishment. It doesn't work for all concepts and it's unlikely to be effective for communicating very complex and innovative subjects.

This is literally the point of an abstract in any and every respected scientific journal I've ever read.

Re: Paul Tudor Jones to Staff: Learn to Write or I'll Rip Up Your Memo

#40

Read your writing out loud to yourself, carefully observing the punctuation. You won't become Hemingway, but you will find the most obvious flaws in your writing.

The only problem with this technique is that people start dropping in commas everywhere they'd take a breath. It's a pretty good approach, otherwise.
Post reply on HN