Live data from Hacker News

How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

snapsnapsnap.photos

31–40 of 101 posts

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#31

I know it's not new, but there is still something quite powerful about the fact that a photograph taken by a pocket-sized device has enough quality to clearly show the outline of the photographer in the subject's eye.

Yup. And these photos are all gorgeous. I think we're at a point were the limiting factor is not the camera, but the photographers' skill.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#32
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you sure it's not just postprocessing? Many of my friends and I all have DSLRs but my photos are always the best because I know how to use Lightroom.

As a very amateur photographer, do you use lightroom on every photo? What sort of photo enhancements do you do?

Very often you just need to adjust levels and white balance to see a significant improvement on many photos. You don’t even need Lightroom for that, even more basic photo editors like OS X Photos work fine.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#34
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, a comparison with a decent point-and-shoot camera would be good, but the purpose of including a high-quality DSLR shot in the comparison would be as a reference point for "this is the best that the shot can possibly look", in order to put things on an absolute scale rather than just a relative one. (Obviously, the article text should make this purpose clear.)

> but the purpose of including a high-quality DSLR shot in the comparison would be as a reference point for "this is the best that the shot can possibly look" Ever heard of medium format? (and there are other options too).

Commercial medium format cameras are, disappointingly enough, optimized for studio shoots and don't do well in low-light or other challenging conditions. Hasselblad isn't best at everything.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#35
post #18

And how it compares to other Android flagships: http://androidcommunity.com/android-flagships-may-have-margi... tl;dr first time it doesn't beat them.

Upvoted you because I think it's relevant. My initial knowledge was that iPhones beat even flagship Androids when it comes to photography, but I was surprised to learn the difference only recently.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#36
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it'd be more useful comparing with a "decent" point and shoot, because that's the market being eroded by camera phones. The only people moving from DSLRs to camera phones probably didn't really need the power of a DSLR in the first place.

Yes, a comparison with a decent point-and-shoot camera would be good, but the purpose of including a high-quality DSLR shot in the comparison would be as a reference point for "this is the best that the shot can possibly look", in order to put things on an absolute scale rather than just a relative one. (Obviously, the article text should make this purpose clear.)

It wouldn't be any more absolute than it is now. If anything, it would just open it up to a million other critiques related to the DSLR chosen.

And it'd be mostly irrelevant anyway, because it ignores all the other advantages of using a DSLR.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#37

I'm on a 5S. This might sound like melodramatic consumerist envy, but I've been struck over the last year by how many emotionally stirring pictures I've seen amateurs take with the iPhone 6. My phone can take a pretty sharp photo of a baby/puppy/landscape, but there's something about the 6 generation that almost triggers that sense of "presence" people bring up in regard to VR. I think you can see this pretty vividly…

Are you sure it's not just postprocessing? Many of my friends and I all have DSLRs but my photos are always the best because I know how to use Lightroom.

I'm talking about off the cuff pictures taken by my sisters, who have no knowledge of Photoshop.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#38

I'm on a 5S. This might sound like melodramatic consumerist envy, but I've been struck over the last year by how many emotionally stirring pictures I've seen amateurs take with the iPhone 6. My phone can take a pretty sharp photo of a baby/puppy/landscape, but there's something about the 6 generation that almost triggers that sense of "presence" people bring up in regard to VR. I think you can see this pretty vividly…

Downvotes without any explanation are weird.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#39
post #34
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but the purpose of including a high-quality DSLR shot in the comparison would be as a reference point for "this is the best that the shot can possibly look" Ever heard of medium format? (and there are other options too).

Commercial medium format cameras are, disappointingly enough, optimized for studio shoots and don't do well in low-light or other challenging conditions. Hasselblad isn't best at everything.

Depends on what one asks from them. They might don't do as well on low light as a Sony high-end mirrorless, but they far exceed what their analogue medium format ancestors did (ISO/noise wise), which is more than enough.

I find this modern preoccupation with crazy ISOs (which one would never use in the film era) a red herring. Especially for landscape work, it's a non issue. What you want there is excellent dynamic range, which those offers.

And there are some such as these that are quite the monster: Pentax 645Z.

Re: How does the iPhone 6s camera compare to other iPhone generations?

#40
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? The premise of the article is how the latest iPhone camera compares to previous iphone cameras.

It would give a sense of how far they still have to go.

TBH, the image quality isn't the limiting factor.

The lack of interchangeable lenses, manual control, and RAW files will always limit the appeal of camera phones for pros and more advanced amateurs.

Post reply on HN