Live data from Hacker News

AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

ams-ix.net

31–40 of 57 posts

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More likely due to the release of iOS9. A couple of other European Internet exchanges also peaked last night [0]. In the past few years Apple have been embracing public peering much more - according to PeeringDB they are at 37 locations with many having multiple 100G connections. 0: https://stats.linx.net/aggregate.html

But Apple uses Akamai as their CDN. I always assumed given its age and role that it would have the best peering bar none.

They have built their own CDN - http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2014/02/apple-building-cdn-so...

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#32
post #2

"... underlines AMS-IX’s leading position within the global Internet Exchange Point market." Yeah, i.e. DE-CIX is constantly hitting the 4 Tbps barrier for quite some time now and is trending towards 5 Tbps. https://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/

And the gap will only increase if the proposed intelligence services act (Wiv20xx) is passed by parliament. The act allows the intelligence services to mass surveillance all electronic communication and forces all service providers (not just telecom providers) to pay for surveillance equipment.

Besides being morally wrong to mass surveillance everyone when the current act already allows the intelligence services to monitor the few thousand potential terrorists and spies, it would also hurt the Dutch economy. International companies would move their European cloud infrastucture to e.g. Germany and Dutch startups providing a communication service (i.e. almost any startup) would be less trusted by their users and run the risk of paying for expensive surveillance equipment.

If you are Dutch i recommend reading the reaction of Nederland ICT [1] to the proposed act.

[1] http://www.internetconsultatie.nl/wiv/reactie/828d2159-cf3c-...

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#33
post #21

This is really interesting to see the 19h -> 24h increases in traffic. Most likely due to online streaming, this is a predictable sharp increases on the Hamburg and Munich POP[0] for DECIX. [0] https://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/ (scroll a bit down)

More likely due to the release of iOS9. A couple of other European Internet exchanges also peaked last night [0]. In the past few years Apple have been embracing public peering much more - according to PeeringDB they are at 37 locations with many having multiple 100G connections. 0: https://stats.linx.net/aggregate.html

If you look at the weekly statistics, you see the bump everyday. If iOS is putting a concentrated load on the network from 20h to 24h, they could redesign a bit their update system to spread a bit more during the day...

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, to be fair, AMS-IX is located around the Amsterdam Area (a circle of around 30 km orso), while DE-CIX has locations in the US as well. I'm not familiar with the specifics, but based on these locations, I'd say AMS-IX is the biggest internet exchange serving europe.

https://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/ shows statistics for Frankfurt of > 4GBit/s

> 4GBit/s is technically correct, however I think you meant > 4TBit/s.

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#35
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How long does it take to transfer a gigabyte file? Sure we can do the math but why (considering the average person)? Maybe there should be a common core revolution in engineering :-)

I can't do the exact math for that without looking up up a bunch of stuff. I don't how much I need to subtract for the multiple headers and other overhead, how fast the transfer rate gets to the maximum, how many packages get lost, what other factors of the congestion control algorithms might impact my transfer etc

Try this bandwidth calculator (it's in German, but I think it's not hard to understand)

http://www.heise.de/netze/tools/bandbreitenrechner/

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#36
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How long does it take to transfer a gigabyte file? Sure we can do the math but why (considering the average person)? Maybe there should be a common core revolution in engineering :-)

I can't do the exact math for that without looking up up a bunch of stuff. I don't how much I need to subtract for the multiple headers and other overhead, how fast the transfer rate gets to the maximum, how many packages get lost, what other factors of the congestion control algorithms might impact my transfer etc

I just divide by 10. How long will it take to download a 100MB file with a 100Mbps connection? Approximately 10 seconds. I know that the theoretical maximum is 8 seconds, but practical factors like flow control and all that more or less cancel out the 20% error.

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#37
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Something does seem funky. The website looked like this in 1997: http://web.archive.org/web/19970418234503id_/http://www.bath... [This page is 3,780 bytes.] In fact, you can find the server stats from back then: http://web.archive.org/web/19970822145424/http://www.bath.ac... This says that it transferred "3 599 Mbytes" and there were "728 506" requests. Interpreting "3 599" as 3.599 gives 4.94 bytes per request, whic…

it reads as if by order of magnitude jump you mean "megabyte to gigabyte" but (obviously, now that I point it out) that is 3 orders of magnitude jump!

I think he is correct. An order of magnitude change for (most) SI units is a change by a factor of 10, while it is a change by a factor of 1024 for bytes.

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#38
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Something does seem funky. The website looked like this in 1997: http://web.archive.org/web/19970418234503id_/http://www.bath... [This page is 3,780 bytes.] In fact, you can find the server stats from back then: http://web.archive.org/web/19970822145424/http://www.bath.ac... This says that it transferred "3 599 Mbytes" and there were "728 506" requests. Interpreting "3 599" as 3.599 gives 4.94 bytes per request, whic…

it reads as if by order of magnitude jump you mean "megabyte to gigabyte" but (obviously, now that I point it out) that is 3 orders of magnitude jump!

[deleted]

Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier

#39
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More likely due to the release of iOS9. A couple of other European Internet exchanges also peaked last night [0]. In the past few years Apple have been embracing public peering much more - according to PeeringDB they are at 37 locations with many having multiple 100G connections. 0: https://stats.linx.net/aggregate.html

If you look at the weekly statistics, you see the bump everyday. If iOS is putting a concentrated load on the network from 20h to 24h, they could redesign a bit their update system to spread a bit more during the day...

It's not that easy.

The peak at that European time is due to people getting home to unrestricted Internet access - which means their device can phone home and update.

I don't believe in coincidences ;)

Post reply on HN