Earlier quoted context omitted.
More likely due to the release of iOS9. A couple of other European Internet exchanges also peaked last night [0]. In the past few years Apple have been embracing public peering much more - according to PeeringDB they are at 37 locations with many having multiple 100G connections. 0: https://stats.linx.net/aggregate.html
But Apple uses Akamai as their CDN. I always assumed given its age and role that it would have the best peering bar none.
AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
31–40 of 57 posts
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#32"... underlines AMS-IX’s leading position within the global Internet Exchange Point market." Yeah, i.e. DE-CIX is constantly hitting the 4 Tbps barrier for quite some time now and is trending towards 5 Tbps. https://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/
Besides being morally wrong to mass surveillance everyone when the current act already allows the intelligence services to monitor the few thousand potential terrorists and spies, it would also hurt the Dutch economy. International companies would move their European cloud infrastucture to e.g. Germany and Dutch startups providing a communication service (i.e. almost any startup) would be less trusted by their users and run the risk of paying for expensive surveillance equipment.
If you are Dutch i recommend reading the reaction of Nederland ICT [1] to the proposed act.
[1] http://www.internetconsultatie.nl/wiv/reactie/828d2159-cf3c-...
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#33This is really interesting to see the 19h -> 24h increases in traffic. Most likely due to online streaming, this is a predictable sharp increases on the Hamburg and Munich POP[0] for DECIX. [0] https://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/ (scroll a bit down)
More likely due to the release of iOS9. A couple of other European Internet exchanges also peaked last night [0]. In the past few years Apple have been embracing public peering much more - according to PeeringDB they are at 37 locations with many having multiple 100G connections. 0: https://stats.linx.net/aggregate.html
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, to be fair, AMS-IX is located around the Amsterdam Area (a circle of around 30 km orso), while DE-CIX has locations in the US as well. I'm not familiar with the specifics, but based on these locations, I'd say AMS-IX is the biggest internet exchange serving europe.
https://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/ shows statistics for Frankfurt of > 4GBit/s
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
How long does it take to transfer a gigabyte file? Sure we can do the math but why (considering the average person)? Maybe there should be a common core revolution in engineering :-)
I can't do the exact math for that without looking up up a bunch of stuff. I don't how much I need to subtract for the multiple headers and other overhead, how fast the transfer rate gets to the maximum, how many packages get lost, what other factors of the congestion control algorithms might impact my transfer etc
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
How long does it take to transfer a gigabyte file? Sure we can do the math but why (considering the average person)? Maybe there should be a common core revolution in engineering :-)
I can't do the exact math for that without looking up up a bunch of stuff. I don't how much I need to subtract for the multiple headers and other overhead, how fast the transfer rate gets to the maximum, how many packages get lost, what other factors of the congestion control algorithms might impact my transfer etc
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something does seem funky. The website looked like this in 1997: http://web.archive.org/web/19970418234503id_/http://www.bath... [This page is 3,780 bytes.] In fact, you can find the server stats from back then: http://web.archive.org/web/19970822145424/http://www.bath.ac... This says that it transferred "3 599 Mbytes" and there were "728 506" requests. Interpreting "3 599" as 3.599 gives 4.94 bytes per request, whic…
it reads as if by order of magnitude jump you mean "megabyte to gigabyte" but (obviously, now that I point it out) that is 3 orders of magnitude jump!
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something does seem funky. The website looked like this in 1997: http://web.archive.org/web/19970418234503id_/http://www.bath... [This page is 3,780 bytes.] In fact, you can find the server stats from back then: http://web.archive.org/web/19970822145424/http://www.bath.ac... This says that it transferred "3 599 Mbytes" and there were "728 506" requests. Interpreting "3 599" as 3.599 gives 4.94 bytes per request, whic…
it reads as if by order of magnitude jump you mean "megabyte to gigabyte" but (obviously, now that I point it out) that is 3 orders of magnitude jump!
Re: AMS-IX Breaks 4 Terabits per Second Barrier
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
More likely due to the release of iOS9. A couple of other European Internet exchanges also peaked last night [0]. In the past few years Apple have been embracing public peering much more - according to PeeringDB they are at 37 locations with many having multiple 100G connections. 0: https://stats.linx.net/aggregate.html
If you look at the weekly statistics, you see the bump everyday. If iOS is putting a concentrated load on the network from 20h to 24h, they could redesign a bit their update system to spread a bit more during the day...
The peak at that European time is due to people getting home to unrestricted Internet access - which means their device can phone home and update.
I don't believe in coincidences ;)