Live data from Hacker News

ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

techcrunch.com

31–40 of 88 posts

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#31
Comments on HN normally provide both sides to the story, so I am hoping someone with deep/vast server knowledge and the VPS market will provide a critique of why this is "not so good".

Also, France? Same country that is trying to push privacy-unfriendly laws? Probably not a good idea to use this service for VPN then.

It would probably suffice as a test-box or cheap-static hosting I guess.

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#33
post #19
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The bandwidth is capped far below the max I assume, does that not provide a stable 200 mbit for everyone?

Unlikely...If there are 912 blades per server it would require 20Gbps of dedicated capacity per server. Having played around with Scaleway servers, they have at least a two cabinets of these servers (10-20 servers). Online.net's total network capacity is in the realm of 1Tbps. They would have to dedicated anywhere from 20-40% of their network capacity if they were to guarantee 200mbit

of course we don't deploy a network accounting for every machine at 200mb/s flat 24/24, this would just be throwing money away. The reality is that most users won't be using these 200mb/s constantly, every customer have different traffic pattern usages. We (online.net) have a long history in dedicated servers (yes we have a >1tb/s global network footprint), we known how to scale the network the proper way. It is carefully monitored, when upgrades are needed, we do upgrade (for example you can check on status.online.net network section, you will see that we upgrade when it is needed, we have quite a few ongoing) the same applies to scaleway, we can upgrade network uplinks if needed and we do monitor that closely Note that only uplinks to the backbone are "shared", each 1gb/s port of the servers really are dedicated Hope this clarifies the design :)

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#34

Is the storage attached directly to the box or is it a SAN? I'd like to use one of these for a personal email server, but don't want to bother if a fried disk or disk controller would result in significant downtime for my email.

It's a SAN, mounted as a NBD.

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#35
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fixed this up, sorry, don't have a lot of knowledge about ARM architecture.

Tangential rant: What is wrong with CPU manufacturers in particular? What do they gain from giving everything the most confusing names possible? Sockets LGA1155, LGA1150, LGA1151. CPUs only differentiated by a jumble of digits anymore. Something is seriously wrong with your product naming strategy when it needs to be clarified that ARM7 != ARMv7.

Intel uses the letters to indicate the type of connection between the CPU and motherboard. So LGA = Land Grid Array [1]. The number is the number of pins/contacts connecting the CPU to the motherboard. So LGA1155 is a Land Grid Array Socket with 1,155 pins.

It's definitely not random, at least not with Intel. ARM is confusing as hell though. Part of the issue is that there is the ARM Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) that has different versions, and then there are different ARM CPU architectures, but those two don't necessarily need to correspond.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_grid_array

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#36

Comments on HN normally provide both sides to the story, so I am hoping someone with deep/vast server knowledge and the VPS market will provide a critique of why this is "not so good". Also, France? Same country that is trying to push privacy-unfriendly laws? Probably not a good idea to use this service for VPN then. It would probably suffice as a test-box or cheap-static hosting I guess.

> Also, France? Same country that is trying to push privacy-unfriendly laws? Probably not a good idea to use this service for VPN then.

As opposed to all those famously Switzerland-based companies such as AWS, Heroku, DigitalOcean...

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#38

Comments on HN normally provide both sides to the story, so I am hoping someone with deep/vast server knowledge and the VPS market will provide a critique of why this is "not so good". Also, France? Same country that is trying to push privacy-unfriendly laws? Probably not a good idea to use this service for VPN then. It would probably suffice as a test-box or cheap-static hosting I guess.

If your concerned with privacy friendly VPS then you really can't purchase virtual servers in any western country.

I suggest you look into eastern europe where you can purchase server time in BTC.

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#39

Comments on HN normally provide both sides to the story, so I am hoping someone with deep/vast server knowledge and the VPS market will provide a critique of why this is "not so good". Also, France? Same country that is trying to push privacy-unfriendly laws? Probably not a good idea to use this service for VPN then. It would probably suffice as a test-box or cheap-static hosting I guess.

Probably not the best place to run a seedbox either.
Post reply on HN